TY - JOUR
T1 - Visual-Somatosensory Integration and Quantitative Gait Performance in Aging
AU - Mahoney, Jeannette R.
AU - Verghese, Joe
N1 - Funding Information:
Special thanks to our participants and our research assistants for their outstanding assistance with this project. Funding. This work was supported by the National Institute on Aging at the National Institute of Health (K01AG049813 to JM), (R01AG044007 to JV), and (R01AG036921 to Dr. Roee Holtzer). Additional funding was supported by the Resnick Gerontology Center of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine.
Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2018 Mahoney and Verghese.
PY - 2018/11/27
Y1 - 2018/11/27
N2 - Background: The ability to integrate information across sensory modalities is an integral aspect of mobility. Yet, the association between visual-somatosensory (VS) integration and gait performance has not been well-established in aging. Methods: A total of 333 healthy older adults (mean age 76.53 ± 6.22; 53% female) participated in a visual-somatosensory simple reaction time task and underwent quantitative gait assessment using an instrumented walkway. Magnitude of VS integration was assessed using probability models, and then categorized into four integration classifications (superior, good, poor, or deficient). Associations of VS integration with three independent gait factors (Pace, Rhythm, and Variability derived by factor analysis method) were tested at cross-section using linear regression analyses. Given overlaps in neural circuitry necessary for both multisensory integration and goal-directed locomotion, we hypothesized that VS integration would be significantly associated with pace but not rhythm which is a more automatic process controlled mainly through brainstem and spinal networks. Results: In keeping with our hypothesis, magnitude of VS integration was a strong predictor of pace (β = 0.12, p < 0.05) but not rhythm (β = −0.01, p = 0.83) in fully-adjusted models. While there was a trend for the association of magnitude of VS integration with variability (β = −0.11, p = 0.051), post-hoc testing of individual gait variables that loaded highest on the variability factor revealed that stride length variability (β = −0.13, p = 0.03) and not swing time variability (β = −0.08, p = 0.15) was significantly associated with magnitude of VS integration. Of the cohort, 29% had superior, 26% had good, 29% had poor, and 16% had deficient VS integration effects. Conclusions: Worse VS integration in aging is associated with worse spatial but not temporal aspects of gait performance.
AB - Background: The ability to integrate information across sensory modalities is an integral aspect of mobility. Yet, the association between visual-somatosensory (VS) integration and gait performance has not been well-established in aging. Methods: A total of 333 healthy older adults (mean age 76.53 ± 6.22; 53% female) participated in a visual-somatosensory simple reaction time task and underwent quantitative gait assessment using an instrumented walkway. Magnitude of VS integration was assessed using probability models, and then categorized into four integration classifications (superior, good, poor, or deficient). Associations of VS integration with three independent gait factors (Pace, Rhythm, and Variability derived by factor analysis method) were tested at cross-section using linear regression analyses. Given overlaps in neural circuitry necessary for both multisensory integration and goal-directed locomotion, we hypothesized that VS integration would be significantly associated with pace but not rhythm which is a more automatic process controlled mainly through brainstem and spinal networks. Results: In keeping with our hypothesis, magnitude of VS integration was a strong predictor of pace (β = 0.12, p < 0.05) but not rhythm (β = −0.01, p = 0.83) in fully-adjusted models. While there was a trend for the association of magnitude of VS integration with variability (β = −0.11, p = 0.051), post-hoc testing of individual gait variables that loaded highest on the variability factor revealed that stride length variability (β = −0.13, p = 0.03) and not swing time variability (β = −0.08, p = 0.15) was significantly associated with magnitude of VS integration. Of the cohort, 29% had superior, 26% had good, 29% had poor, and 16% had deficient VS integration effects. Conclusions: Worse VS integration in aging is associated with worse spatial but not temporal aspects of gait performance.
KW - falls
KW - gait
KW - mobility
KW - multisensory processing
KW - sensorimotor integration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067921037&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067921037&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00377
DO - 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00377
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85067921037
SN - 1663-4365
VL - 10
JO - Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
JF - Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
M1 - 377
ER -