TY - JOUR
T1 - Transition from film to digital mammography
T2 - Impact for breast cancer screening through the national breast and cervical cancer early detection program
AU - Van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T.
AU - Van Lier, Lisanne
AU - Schechter, Clyde B.
AU - Ekwueme, Donatus U.
AU - Royalty, Janet
AU - Miller, Jacqueline W.
AU - Near, Aimee M.
AU - Cronin, Kathleen A.
AU - Heijnsdijk, Eveline A.M.
AU - Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.
AU - De Koning, Harry J.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by an Interagency Agreement from CDC to the NCI and funded under Grant No. U01CA115337-10S1 . This study was also supported in part by the NCI (Grant Nos. U01CA152958 , U01CA088283 ; grant No. KO5CA96940 [JM]) and the Department of Defense (Grant No. BC043120 [JM]). Model results are the sole responsibility of the authors. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of CDC.
Funding Information:
We thank the National Comprehensive Cancer Network investigators for use of data on treatment dissemination. We thank the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) investigators for the data they have provided for this study. BCSC data collection was supported by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) –funded Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (Grant No. HHSN261201100031C ). A list of the BCSC investigators and procedures for requesting BCSC data for research purposes are provided at: breastscreening.cancer.gov/ . Drs.Mandelblatt and de Koning contributed equally to this work as senior authors.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Journal of Preventive Medicine.
PY - 2015/5/1
Y1 - 2015/5/1
N2 - Introduction The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) provides mammograms and diagnostic services for low-income, uninsured women aged 40-64 years. Mammography facilities within the NBCCEDP gradually shifted from plain-film to digital mammography. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of replacing film with digital mammography on health effects (deaths averted, life-years gained [LYG]); costs (for screening and diagnostics); and number of women reached. Methods NBCCEDP 2010 data and data representative of the program's target population were used in two established microsimulation models. Models simulated observed screening behavior including different screening intervals (annual, biennial, irregular) and starting ages (40, 50 years) for white, black, and Hispanic women. Model runs were performed in 2012. Results The models predicted 8.0-8.3 LYG per 1,000 film screens for black women, 5.9-7.5 for white women, and 4.0-4.5 for Hispanic women. For all race/ethnicity groups, digital mammography had more LYG than film mammography (2%-4%), but had higher costs (34%-35%). Assuming a fixed budget, 25%-26% fewer women could be served, resulting in 22%-24% fewer LYG if all mammograms were converted to digital. The loss in LYG could be reversed to an 8%-13% increase by only including biennial screening. Conclusions Digital could result in slightly more LYG than film mammography. However, with a fixed budget, fewer women may be served with fewer LYG. Changes in the program, such as only including biennial screening, will increase LYG/screen and could offset the potential decrease in LYG when shifting to digital mammography.
AB - Introduction The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) provides mammograms and diagnostic services for low-income, uninsured women aged 40-64 years. Mammography facilities within the NBCCEDP gradually shifted from plain-film to digital mammography. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of replacing film with digital mammography on health effects (deaths averted, life-years gained [LYG]); costs (for screening and diagnostics); and number of women reached. Methods NBCCEDP 2010 data and data representative of the program's target population were used in two established microsimulation models. Models simulated observed screening behavior including different screening intervals (annual, biennial, irregular) and starting ages (40, 50 years) for white, black, and Hispanic women. Model runs were performed in 2012. Results The models predicted 8.0-8.3 LYG per 1,000 film screens for black women, 5.9-7.5 for white women, and 4.0-4.5 for Hispanic women. For all race/ethnicity groups, digital mammography had more LYG than film mammography (2%-4%), but had higher costs (34%-35%). Assuming a fixed budget, 25%-26% fewer women could be served, resulting in 22%-24% fewer LYG if all mammograms were converted to digital. The loss in LYG could be reversed to an 8%-13% increase by only including biennial screening. Conclusions Digital could result in slightly more LYG than film mammography. However, with a fixed budget, fewer women may be served with fewer LYG. Changes in the program, such as only including biennial screening, will increase LYG/screen and could offset the potential decrease in LYG when shifting to digital mammography.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928239096&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928239096&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.11.010
DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.11.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 25891052
AN - SCOPUS:84928239096
SN - 0749-3797
VL - 48
SP - 535
EP - 542
JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
IS - 5
ER -