Three-dimensional intracardiac echocardiography for left atrial appendage sizing and percutaneous occlusion guidance

Domenico G. Della Rocca, Michele Magnocavallo, Carola Gianni, Sanghamitra Mohanty, Amin Al-Ahmad, Mohamed Bassiouny, Marialessia Denora, Vincenzo Mirco La Fazia, Carlo Lavalle, Gerald J. Gallinghouse, Pasquale Santangeli, Marco Polselli, Andrea Sarkozy, Giampaolo Vetta, Adnan Ahmed, Javier E. Sanchez, Luigi Pannone, Gian Battista Chierchia, David R. Tschopp, Carlo De AsmundisLuigi Di Biase, Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy, David J. Burkhardt, Rodney P. Horton, Andrea Natale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aims: Left atrial appendage (LAA) imaging is critical during percutaneous occlusion procedures. 3D-intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) features direct visualization of LAA from multiple cross-sectional planes at a time. We aimed at reporting procedural success of 3D-ICE-guided LAA occlusion and the correlation between pre-procedural transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and intraprocedural 3D-ICE for LAA sizing. Methods and results: Among 274 patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with a Watchman FLX, periprocedural ICE guidance was achieved via a commercially available 2D-ICE catheter (220 patients) or a novel (NUVISION™) 3D-ICE one (54 patients). Primary endpoint was a composite of procedural success and LAA sealing at follow-up TEE. Secondary endpoint was a composite of periprocedural device recapture/resizing plus presence of leaks ≥ 3amm at follow-up TEE. 3D-ICE measurements of maximum landing zone correlated highly with pre-procedural TEE reference values [Pearson's: 0.94; P < 0.001; bias:-0.06 (-2.39, 2.27)]. The agreement between 3D-ICE-based device selection and final device size was 96.3% vs. 79.1% with 2D-ICE (P = 0.005). The incidence of the primary endpoint was 98.1% with 3D-ICE and 97.3% with 2D-ICE (P = 0.99). 2D-ICE patients had a trend towards a higher incidence of periprocedural device recapture/redeployment (31.5% vs. 44.5%; P = 0.09). The secondary endpoint occurred in 31.5% of 3D-ICE patients vs. 45.9% of 2D-ICE ones (P = 0.065). Conclusion: Intracardiac echocardiography-guided LAAO showed a very high success, with no major adverse events. A very high level of agreement for LAA sizing was found between pre-procedural TEE and periprocedural 3D-ICE. 3D-ICE performed significantly better than 2D-ICE for FLX size selection and may provide better guidance during device deployment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbereuae010
JournalEuropace
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2024

Keywords

  • FLX
  • Intracardiac echocardiography
  • Left atrial appendage
  • Stroke
  • Thromboembolism
  • Transoesophageal echocardiography
  • Watchman

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Three-dimensional intracardiac echocardiography for left atrial appendage sizing and percutaneous occlusion guidance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this