The Evolving Profile of the Signature Amino Acid Residues in HIV-1 Subtype C Tat

Shambhu Prasad G. Aralaguppe, Shilpee Sharma, Malini Menon, Vinayaka R. Prasad, Shanmugam Saravanan, Kailapuri G. Murugavel, Suniti Solomon, Udaykumar Ranga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Using several HIV-1 tat exon 1 amino acid sequences available from public databases and additional sequences derived from a southern Indian clinical cohort, we compared the profile of the signature amino acid residues (SAR) between two different time periods, 1986-2004 and 2005-2014. The analysis identified eight positions as signature residues in subtype C Tat and demonstrated a changing pattern at four of these positions between the two periods. At three locations (histidine 29, serine 57, and proline 60), there appears to be a nonuniform negative selection against the SAR. The negative selection appears to be severe, especially against histidine 29 (p < .0001) and moderate against proline 60 (p < .0001). The negative selection against serine 57 is statistically insignificant and appears to have begun recently. At position 63, the frequency of signature residue glutamic acid increased over the past decade, although the difference was not significant. Importantly, at the three locations where the negative selection is in progress, the substitute amino acids are the generic residues present in most of the other HIV-1 subtypes. Our data demonstrate that viral evolution can subject specific amino acid residues to subtle and progressive selection pressures without affecting the prevalence of other amino acid residues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)503-514
Number of pages12
JournalAIDS Research and Human Retroviruses
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology
  • Virology
  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Evolving Profile of the Signature Amino Acid Residues in HIV-1 Subtype C Tat'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this