The continued importance of comparative auditory research to modern scientific discovery

Grace Capshaw, Andrew D. Brown, José L. Peña, Catherine E. Carr, Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard, Daniel J. Tollin, Molly C. Womack, Elizabeth A. McCullagh

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

A rich history of comparative research in the auditory field has afforded a synthetic view of sound information processing by ears and brains. Some organisms have proven to be powerful models for human hearing due to fundamental similarities (e.g., well-matched hearing ranges), while others feature intriguing differences (e.g., atympanic ears) that invite further study. Work across diverse “non-traditional” organisms, from small mammals to avians to amphibians and beyond, continues to propel auditory science forward, netting a variety of biomedical and technological advances along the way. In this brief review, limited primarily to tetrapod vertebrates, we discuss the continued importance of comparative studies in hearing research from the periphery to central nervous system with a focus on outstanding questions such as mechanisms for sound capture, peripheral and central processing of directional/spatial information, and non-canonical auditory processing, including efferent and hormonal effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number108766
JournalHearing Research
Volume433
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2023

Keywords

  • Auditory system
  • Bone conduction
  • Comparative biology
  • Directional hearing
  • Ears
  • Hearing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sensory Systems

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The continued importance of comparative auditory research to modern scientific discovery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this