TY - JOUR
T1 - The association between simple reaction time variability and gait variability
T2 - The Tasmanian Study of Cognition and Gait
AU - Jayakody, Oshadi
AU - Breslin, Monique
AU - Beare, Richard
AU - Siejka, Timothy P.
AU - Gujjari, Siddhanth
AU - Srikanth, Velandai K.
AU - Blumen, Helena M.
AU - Callisaya, Michele L.
N1 - Funding Information:
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHRMC) Project grant ( 1003645 , 403000BH and 491109 ) Perpetual Trustees , Brain Foundation , Royal Hobart Hospital Research Foundation (grant number 341M ), ANZ Charitable Trust and Masonic Centenary Medical Research Foundation MC is funded by NHMRC Boosting Dementia Research Leadership Fellowship ( 1135761 )
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Introduction: Greater double support time (DST) variability is associated with falls and memory decline. The underlying neurophysiological mechanisms of DST variability are poorly understood. Simple reaction time (SRT) variability, a measure of attention-processing speed is associated with falls and dementia and, may underlie greater DST variability. The aims of this study were to examine the association between SRT and DST variability and if SRT variability mediates the associations between poorer cognition/brain structure and DST variability. Methods: Participants (n = 408) were community-dwelling older people without dementia (mean age 72.0 ± 7.0). DST variability was the standard deviation (SD) of DST, assessed with a walkway and averaged across steps of 6 walks. SRT variability was the SD of a button pressing task in response to a visual stimulus. Executive function and processing speed were assessed with neuropsychological tests. Magnetic Resonance Imaging was used to obtain cortical thickness (total and in frontal regions) and cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD). Multivariable linear regression models were used to examine the association between SRT and DST variability and if SRT variability mediated any associations of cognition/brain structure with DST variability. Results: Greater SRT variability was associated with greater DST variability (p = 0.002). SRT variability partially mediated the association between poorer executive function and greater DST variability. Smaller mean thickness in orbitofrontal regions and greater cSVD burden were only associated with DST variability (p < 0.05), not with SRT variability (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Greater SRT variability, which may occur due to inefficient executive functioning, could be an underlying neurophysiological mechanism of greater DST variability.
AB - Introduction: Greater double support time (DST) variability is associated with falls and memory decline. The underlying neurophysiological mechanisms of DST variability are poorly understood. Simple reaction time (SRT) variability, a measure of attention-processing speed is associated with falls and dementia and, may underlie greater DST variability. The aims of this study were to examine the association between SRT and DST variability and if SRT variability mediates the associations between poorer cognition/brain structure and DST variability. Methods: Participants (n = 408) were community-dwelling older people without dementia (mean age 72.0 ± 7.0). DST variability was the standard deviation (SD) of DST, assessed with a walkway and averaged across steps of 6 walks. SRT variability was the SD of a button pressing task in response to a visual stimulus. Executive function and processing speed were assessed with neuropsychological tests. Magnetic Resonance Imaging was used to obtain cortical thickness (total and in frontal regions) and cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD). Multivariable linear regression models were used to examine the association between SRT and DST variability and if SRT variability mediated any associations of cognition/brain structure with DST variability. Results: Greater SRT variability was associated with greater DST variability (p = 0.002). SRT variability partially mediated the association between poorer executive function and greater DST variability. Smaller mean thickness in orbitofrontal regions and greater cSVD burden were only associated with DST variability (p < 0.05), not with SRT variability (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Greater SRT variability, which may occur due to inefficient executive functioning, could be an underlying neurophysiological mechanism of greater DST variability.
KW - Brain structure
KW - Cognition
KW - Double support time variability
KW - Gait
KW - Reaction time variability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111525390&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85111525390&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.07.016
DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.07.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 34340157
AN - SCOPUS:85111525390
SN - 0966-6362
VL - 89
SP - 206
EP - 210
JO - Gait and Posture
JF - Gait and Posture
ER -