TY - JOUR
T1 - Temporal relationships between esophageal injury type and progression in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation
AU - Yarlagadda, Bharath
AU - Deneke, Thomas
AU - Turagam, Mohit
AU - Dar, Tawseef
AU - Paleti, Swathi
AU - Parikh, Valay
AU - DiBiase, Luigi
AU - Halfbass, Philipp
AU - Santangeli, Pasquale
AU - Mahapatra, Srijoy
AU - Cheng, Jie
AU - Russo, Andrea
AU - Edgerton, James
AU - Mansour, Moussa
AU - Ruskin, Jeremy
AU - Dukkipati, Srinivas
AU - Wilber, David
AU - Reddy, Vivek
AU - Packer, Douglas
AU - Natale, Andrea
AU - Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya
PY - 2019/2
Y1 - 2019/2
N2 - Background: Currently, little is known about the onset, natural progression, and management of esophageal injuries after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Objectives: We sought to provide a systematic review on esophageal injury after AF ablation and identify temporal relationships between various types of esophageal lesions, their progression, and clinical outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed and Web of Science was conducted until September 21, 2017. All AF ablation patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy within 1 week of the procedure were included. Patients with esophageal lesions were classified into 3 types by using our novel Kansas City classification: type 1: erythema; type 2a: superficial ulcers; type 2b: deep ulcers; type 3a: perforation without communication with the atria; and type 3b: perforation with atrioesophageal fistula. Results: Thirty studies met our inclusion criteria. Of the 4473 patients, 3921 underwent upper gastrointestinal evaluation. The overall incidence of esophageal injuries was 15% (570). There were 206 type 1 lesions (36%), 222 type 2a lesions (39%), and 142 type 2b lesions (25%). Six of 142 type 2b lesions (4.2%) progressed further to type 3, of which, 5 were type 3a and 1 was type 3b. All type 1 and type 2a and most type 2b lesions resolved with conservative management. One type 3a and 1 type 3b lesions were fatal. Conclusion: Based on our classification, all type 1 and most type 2 lesions resolved with conservative management. A small percentage (4.2% [6 of 142]) of type 2b lesions progressed to perforation and/or fistula formation, and these patients need to be followed closely.
AB - Background: Currently, little is known about the onset, natural progression, and management of esophageal injuries after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Objectives: We sought to provide a systematic review on esophageal injury after AF ablation and identify temporal relationships between various types of esophageal lesions, their progression, and clinical outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed and Web of Science was conducted until September 21, 2017. All AF ablation patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy within 1 week of the procedure were included. Patients with esophageal lesions were classified into 3 types by using our novel Kansas City classification: type 1: erythema; type 2a: superficial ulcers; type 2b: deep ulcers; type 3a: perforation without communication with the atria; and type 3b: perforation with atrioesophageal fistula. Results: Thirty studies met our inclusion criteria. Of the 4473 patients, 3921 underwent upper gastrointestinal evaluation. The overall incidence of esophageal injuries was 15% (570). There were 206 type 1 lesions (36%), 222 type 2a lesions (39%), and 142 type 2b lesions (25%). Six of 142 type 2b lesions (4.2%) progressed further to type 3, of which, 5 were type 3a and 1 was type 3b. All type 1 and type 2a and most type 2b lesions resolved with conservative management. One type 3a and 1 type 3b lesions were fatal. Conclusion: Based on our classification, all type 1 and most type 2 lesions resolved with conservative management. A small percentage (4.2% [6 of 142]) of type 2b lesions progressed to perforation and/or fistula formation, and these patients need to be followed closely.
KW - Atrial fibrillation
KW - Atrioesophageal fistula
KW - Catheter ablation/Adverse effects
KW - Esophageal injuries
KW - Esophageal perforation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057605934&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057605934&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.09.027
DO - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.09.027
M3 - Article
C2 - 30273767
AN - SCOPUS:85057605934
SN - 1547-5271
VL - 16
SP - 204
EP - 212
JO - Heart Rhythm
JF - Heart Rhythm
IS - 2
ER -