Socioeconomic Disparities Associated with Access to Oculofacial Plastic Surgeons: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of US County Demographics

Ricky Paramo, Amanda M. Zong, Anne Barmettler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To compare population demographics with the geographic distribution of oculofacial plastic surgeons (OPSs) in the United States. Design: A cross-sectional study design was used to investigate demographic differences between counties with 1 or more OPSs and counties with zero OPSs. Participants: The number of OPSs were identified in each US county using online public databases: American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons and American Academy of Ophthalmology. Counties were categorized into 2 groups: 1 or more OPSs and zero OPSs. Demographic characteristics at the county level were obtained from the 2021 US Census Bureau Population Estimates and the American Community Survey. Cost of living was collected from the 2022 Economic Policy Institute Family Budget Calculator. Main Outcome Measures: Socioeconomic demographics of the US population as related to geographic OPS distribution. Results: A total of 1238 OPSs were identified. States with the most OPSs per million were Hawaii (6.2), D.C. (6.0), Connecticut (5.8), Utah (5.1), and Maryland (5.0). Among 3143 counties, 2725 (86.7%) had zero OPSs and 418 (13.3%) had 1 or more OPSs. Counties with 1 or more OPSs had a higher median (standard deviation) household income versus counties with zero OPSs ($72 471 [$19 152] vs. $56 152 [$13 675]; difference $16 319; 95% confidence interval [CI], $14 300–$18 338; P < 0.001). The annual cost of living per person (standard deviation) was higher in counties with 1 or more OPSs versus counties with zero OPSs ($39 238 [$6992] vs. $36 227 [$3516]; difference $3011; 95% CI, $2328–$3694; P < 0.001). Counties with zero OPSs versus counties with 1 or more OPSs had higher proportions of persons with only Medicaid (15.6% vs. 13.6%; difference 2.0%; 95% CI, 1.4%–2.5%; P < 0.001), no health insurance (9.9% vs. 8.0%; difference 1.9%; 95% CI, 1.5%–2.4%; P < 0.001), no household internet access (17.2% vs. 9.6%; difference 7.6%; 95% CI, 7.1%–8.0%; P < 0.001), and higher proportions of persons aged 65 years or older (20.0% vs. 17.0%; difference 3.0%; 95% CI, 2.5%–3.5%; P < 0.001). Conclusions: This cross-sectional analysis of all US counties revealed socioeconomic disparities associated with access to OPSs. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)492-498
Number of pages7
JournalOphthalmology
Volume131
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2024

Keywords

  • Geographic distribution
  • Health equity
  • Oculofacial plastic surgeons
  • Oculoplastic surgeons
  • Socioeconomic disparities
  • US counties

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Socioeconomic Disparities Associated with Access to Oculofacial Plastic Surgeons: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of US County Demographics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this