TY - JOUR
T1 - Retrospective estimation of heart and lung doses in pediatric patients treated with spinal irradiation
AU - Gasic, Daniel
AU - Rosenschöld, Per Munck af
AU - Vogelius, Ivan R.
AU - Maraldo, Maja V.
AU - Aznar, Marianne C.
AU - Nysom, Karsten
AU - Björk-Eriksson, Thomas
AU - Bentzen, Søren M.
AU - Brodin, Nils Patrik
N1 - Funding Information:
Drs Björk-Eriksson and Munck af Rosenschöld acknowledge financial support from the Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation and the Danish Child Cancer Foundation . Dr. Brodin acknowledges support from the NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) Einstein-Montefiore CTSA Grant Number KL2TR001071 and UL1TR001073 . Dr. Bentzen acknowledges support from the Kirsten and Freddy Johansen Foundation. Thanks to Medical Physicists Søren Lassen and Bob Smulders (Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark) for aiding in the extraction of treatment data.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2018/8
Y1 - 2018/8
N2 - Background and purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether treatment information from medical records can be used to estimate radiation doses to heart and lungs retrospectively in pediatric patients receiving spinal irradiation with conventional posterior fields. Material and methods: An algorithm for retrospective dosimetry in children treated with spinal irradiation was developed in a cohort of 21 pediatric patients with available CT-scans and treatment plans. We developed a multivariable linear regression model with explanatory variables identifiable in case note review for retrospective estimation of minimum, maximum, mean and V10%–V80% doses to the heart and lungs. Doses were estimated for both linear accelerator (Linac) and 60Co radiation therapy modalities. Results: Age and spinal field width were identified as statistically significant predictors of heart and lung doses in multivariable analyses (p < 0.01 in all models). Models showed excellent predictive performance with R2 = 0.70 for mean heart dose and 0.79 for mean lung dose, for Linac plans. In leave-one-out cross-validation analysis the average difference between predicted and actual mean heart dose was 6.7% and 7.6% of the prescription dose for Linac and 60Co plans, respectively, and 5.2% and 4.9% for mean lung dose. Due to the small sample size and large inter-patient variation in heart and lung dose, prospective studies validating these findings are highly warranted. Conclusions: The models presented here provide retrospective estimates of heart and lung doses for historical cohorts of pediatric patients, thus facilitating studies of long-term adverse effects of radiation.
AB - Background and purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether treatment information from medical records can be used to estimate radiation doses to heart and lungs retrospectively in pediatric patients receiving spinal irradiation with conventional posterior fields. Material and methods: An algorithm for retrospective dosimetry in children treated with spinal irradiation was developed in a cohort of 21 pediatric patients with available CT-scans and treatment plans. We developed a multivariable linear regression model with explanatory variables identifiable in case note review for retrospective estimation of minimum, maximum, mean and V10%–V80% doses to the heart and lungs. Doses were estimated for both linear accelerator (Linac) and 60Co radiation therapy modalities. Results: Age and spinal field width were identified as statistically significant predictors of heart and lung doses in multivariable analyses (p < 0.01 in all models). Models showed excellent predictive performance with R2 = 0.70 for mean heart dose and 0.79 for mean lung dose, for Linac plans. In leave-one-out cross-validation analysis the average difference between predicted and actual mean heart dose was 6.7% and 7.6% of the prescription dose for Linac and 60Co plans, respectively, and 5.2% and 4.9% for mean lung dose. Due to the small sample size and large inter-patient variation in heart and lung dose, prospective studies validating these findings are highly warranted. Conclusions: The models presented here provide retrospective estimates of heart and lung doses for historical cohorts of pediatric patients, thus facilitating studies of long-term adverse effects of radiation.
KW - Dose estimation models
KW - Heart and lungs
KW - Linear regression models
KW - Pediatric spinal irradiation
KW - Retrospective dosimetry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047634899&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047634899&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.013
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 29859753
AN - SCOPUS:85047634899
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 128
SP - 209
EP - 213
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
IS - 2
ER -