TY - JOUR
T1 - Reducing the Discussion Divide by Digital Questionnaires in Health Care Settings
T2 - Disruptive Innovation for HIV Testing and PrEP Screening
AU - John, Steven A.
AU - Petroll, Andrew E.
AU - Walsh, Jennifer L.
AU - Quinn, Katherine G.
AU - Patel, Viraj V.
AU - Grov, Christian
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention–funded NYU-CUNY Prevention Research Center (U48-DP005008) Special Interest Project (SIP 15-009: MPIs: C.G. and Simona Kwon) and the Einstein-Rockefeller-CUNY Center for AIDS Research (P30-AI-124414). Additional support was provided by the National Institute of Mental Health (K01-MH118939, PI: S.A.J.; K01-MH112412, PI: K.G.Q.; K23-MH102118, PI: V.V.P.; P30-MH052776, PI: J.A.K.). The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Funding Information:
A.E.P. receives research funding from Gilead Sciences, Inc. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - Background:Health care provider assessment of patient sexual behavior and substance use is essential for determining appropriate prevention interventions - including HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) - for sexual minority men (SMM). We sought to explore acceptability and utility of using electronic surveys to conduct health behavior assessments in clinical settings among SMM.Methods:Among a US nationwide sample of SMM (n = 4187; mean age = 38.3 years; 60% white; 82% HIV-negative), we examined associations of demographics, recruitment venue, sexual behavior characteristics, and recent substance use with participants' comfort communicating verbally and through electronic survey with a health care provider about sexual and substance use behavior.Results:On average, SMM had greater comfort communicating through electronic survey vs. verbally. In our fully adjusted analysis, preference favoring electronic surveys more strongly than verbal communication differed by age (β = -0.07, P ≤ 0.001). SMM with a bachelor's degree or more (β = 0.04, P < 0.05), those recruited from nonclinical settings (β = 0.06, P ≤ 0.001), and those without primary care providers (β = 0.04, P < 0.05) favored electronic surveys more strongly in the fully adjusted multivariable model. SMM who reported any recent casual sex partners (β = 0.05, P < 0.01), those never tested for HIV (β = 0.03, P < 0.05), and HIV-negative/unknown men not on PrEP (compared with PrEP users; β = 0.09, P ≤ 0.001) also favored electronic surveys in the fully adjusted model.Conclusions:Reducing communication barriers by incorporating electronic surveys into patient assessments could help identify HIV testing and PrEP needs for SMM most susceptible to HIV acquisition. Nonetheless, no one screening strategy is likely to work for most SMM, and multiple approaches are needed.
AB - Background:Health care provider assessment of patient sexual behavior and substance use is essential for determining appropriate prevention interventions - including HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) - for sexual minority men (SMM). We sought to explore acceptability and utility of using electronic surveys to conduct health behavior assessments in clinical settings among SMM.Methods:Among a US nationwide sample of SMM (n = 4187; mean age = 38.3 years; 60% white; 82% HIV-negative), we examined associations of demographics, recruitment venue, sexual behavior characteristics, and recent substance use with participants' comfort communicating verbally and through electronic survey with a health care provider about sexual and substance use behavior.Results:On average, SMM had greater comfort communicating through electronic survey vs. verbally. In our fully adjusted analysis, preference favoring electronic surveys more strongly than verbal communication differed by age (β = -0.07, P ≤ 0.001). SMM with a bachelor's degree or more (β = 0.04, P < 0.05), those recruited from nonclinical settings (β = 0.06, P ≤ 0.001), and those without primary care providers (β = 0.04, P < 0.05) favored electronic surveys more strongly in the fully adjusted multivariable model. SMM who reported any recent casual sex partners (β = 0.05, P < 0.01), those never tested for HIV (β = 0.03, P < 0.05), and HIV-negative/unknown men not on PrEP (compared with PrEP users; β = 0.09, P ≤ 0.001) also favored electronic surveys in the fully adjusted model.Conclusions:Reducing communication barriers by incorporating electronic surveys into patient assessments could help identify HIV testing and PrEP needs for SMM most susceptible to HIV acquisition. Nonetheless, no one screening strategy is likely to work for most SMM, and multiple approaches are needed.
KW - HIV
KW - HIV testing
KW - gay and bisexual men
KW - pre-exposure prophylaxis
KW - sexual minority men
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85093538678&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85093538678&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002459
DO - 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002459
M3 - Article
C2 - 32701822
AN - SCOPUS:85093538678
SN - 1525-4135
VL - 85
SP - 302
EP - 308
JO - Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
JF - Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
IS - 3
ER -