TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiofrequency Ablation for the Knee Joint
T2 - A Survey by the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience
AU - Abd-Elsayed, Alaa
AU - Strand, Natalie
AU - Gritsenko, Karina
AU - Martens, Joshua
AU - Chakravarthy, Krishnan
AU - Sayed, Dawood
AU - Deer, Timothy
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr Karina Gritsenko is consultant for Avanos and Pacira. Dr Krishnan Chakravarthy reports Consultant to Biotronik, Bioventus, Mainstay Medical, Medtronic, SI Bone, Vertos Medical, Vivex Biologics. Dr Krishnan Chakravarthy reports consultant to Biotronik, Bioventus, Mainstay Medical, Medtronic, SI Bone, Vertos Medical, and Vivex Biologics. Dr Dawood Sayed reports personal fees from Medtronic and Abbott, outside the submitted work. Dr Timothy Deer reports grants and travel from American Society of Pain and Neuroscience, during the conduct of the study; personal fees for consultant from Abbott and research funding from Avanos, outside the submitted work. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Dove Medical Press Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background: Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective, minimally invasive procedure often used to treat patients with intractable knee pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis and failed knee replacements. The prevalence of knee pain in adults has been estimated to be as high as 40% and is continuously increasing with an aging population. Over the past two decades, proceduralists have adopted variations in patient preparation, procedural steps, and post-operative care for genicular nerve RFA procedures. A survey was dispensed via the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) to gain a popular assessment of common practices for genicular nerve RFA. Methods: A 29 question survey was dispensed via SurveyMonkey to all members of ASPN. Members were able to respond to the survey a single time and were unable to make changes to their responses once the survey was submitted. After responses were compiled, each question was assessed in order to determine common practices for genicular nerve RFA. Results: A total of 378 proceduralists responded to the survey. There was high consensus with the three most commonly targeted nerves. The inferomedial, superomedial, and superolateral genicular branches were treated by 95–96% of respondents, while other targets were less commonly treated. There remains some debate among proceduralists regarding the need for a second diagnostic nerve block and the type of steroid used for diagnostic nerve blocks. Conclusion: Pain physicians use a wide variety of methods to perform genicular nerve ablations. The data offered by the survey show that there is no standardized protocol when it comes to treating knee pain via genicular nerve block and ablation and highlights controversies among proceduralists that ought to serve as the targets of future clinical research aimed at establishing a standardized protocol.
AB - Background: Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective, minimally invasive procedure often used to treat patients with intractable knee pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis and failed knee replacements. The prevalence of knee pain in adults has been estimated to be as high as 40% and is continuously increasing with an aging population. Over the past two decades, proceduralists have adopted variations in patient preparation, procedural steps, and post-operative care for genicular nerve RFA procedures. A survey was dispensed via the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) to gain a popular assessment of common practices for genicular nerve RFA. Methods: A 29 question survey was dispensed via SurveyMonkey to all members of ASPN. Members were able to respond to the survey a single time and were unable to make changes to their responses once the survey was submitted. After responses were compiled, each question was assessed in order to determine common practices for genicular nerve RFA. Results: A total of 378 proceduralists responded to the survey. There was high consensus with the three most commonly targeted nerves. The inferomedial, superomedial, and superolateral genicular branches were treated by 95–96% of respondents, while other targets were less commonly treated. There remains some debate among proceduralists regarding the need for a second diagnostic nerve block and the type of steroid used for diagnostic nerve blocks. Conclusion: Pain physicians use a wide variety of methods to perform genicular nerve ablations. The data offered by the survey show that there is no standardized protocol when it comes to treating knee pain via genicular nerve block and ablation and highlights controversies among proceduralists that ought to serve as the targets of future clinical research aimed at establishing a standardized protocol.
KW - genicular nerve ablation
KW - genicular nerve block
KW - genicular nerve survey
KW - knee radiofrequency ablation
KW - radiofrequency ablation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129684018&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85129684018&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2147/JPR.S342653
DO - 10.2147/JPR.S342653
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85129684018
SN - 1178-7090
VL - 15
SP - 1247
EP - 1255
JO - Journal of Pain Research
JF - Journal of Pain Research
ER -