Propofol-Based Anesthesia Maintenance and/or Volatile Anesthetics during Intracranial Aneurysm Repair: A Comparative Analysis of Neurological Outcomes

Shooka Esmaeeli, Negar Motayagheni, Andres Brenes Bastos, Christopher S. Ogilvy, Ajith J. Thomas, Richard Pollard, Lauren K. Buhl, Maxwell B. Baker, Sheshanna Phan, Omron Hassan, Corey R. Fehnel, Matthias Eikermann, Shahzad Shaefi, Ala Nozari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Volatile and intravenous anesthetics have substantial effects on physiological functions, notably influencing neurological function and susceptibility to injury. Despite the importance of the anesthetic approach, data on its relative risks or benefits during surgical clipping or endovascular treatments for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) remains scant. We investigated whether using volatile anesthetics alone or in combination with propofol infusion yields superior neurological outcomes following UIA obliteration. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1001 patients who underwent open or endovascular treatment for UIA, of whom 596 had short- and long-term neurological outcome data (modified Rankin Scale) recorded. Multivariable ordinal regression analysis was performed to examine the association between the anesthetic approach and outcomes. Results: Of 1001 patients, 765 received volatile anesthetics alone, while 236 received propofol infusion and volatile anesthetics (combined anesthetic group). Short-term neurological outcome data were available for 619 patients and long-term data for 596. No significant correlation was found between the anesthetic approach and neurologic outcomes, irrespective of the type of procedure (open craniotomy or endovascular treatment). The combined anesthetic group had a higher rate of ICU admission (p < 0.001) and longer ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS, p < 0.001). Similarly, a subgroup analysis revealed longer ICU and hospital LOS (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001, respectively) in patients who underwent endovascular UIA obliteration under a combined anesthetic approach (n = 678). Conclusions: The addition of propofol to volatile anesthetics during UIA obliteration does not provide short- or long-term benefits to neurologic outcomes. Compared to volatile anesthetics alone, the combination of propofol and volatile anesthetics may be associated with an increased rate of ICU admission, as well as longer ICU and hospital LOS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number6954
JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
Volume12
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2023

Keywords

  • craniotomy
  • endovascular surgery
  • general anesthesia
  • propofol
  • unruptured intracranial aneurysm
  • volatile agents

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Propofol-Based Anesthesia Maintenance and/or Volatile Anesthetics during Intracranial Aneurysm Repair: A Comparative Analysis of Neurological Outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this