TY - JOUR
T1 - Prioritizing the Interview in Selecting Resident Applicants
T2 - Behavioral Interviews to Determine Goodness of Fit
AU - Prystowsky, Michael B.
AU - Cadoff, Evan
AU - Lo, Yungtai
AU - Hebert, Tiffany M.
AU - Steinberg, Jacob J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - From our initial screening of applications, we assess that the 10% to 15% of applicants whom we will interview are all academically qualified to complete our residency training program. This initial screening to select applicants to interview includes a personality assessment provided by the personal statement, Dean’s letter, and letters of recommendation that, taken together, begin our evaluation of the applicant’s cultural fit for our program. While the numerical scoring ranks applicants preinterview, the final ranking into best fit categories is determined solely on the interview day at a consensus conference by faculty and residents. We analyzed data of 819 applicants from 2005 to 2017. Most candidates were US medical graduates (62.5%) with 23.7% international medical graduates, 11.7% Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine (DO), and 2.1% Caribbean medical graduates. Given that personality assessment began with application review, there was excellent correlation between the preinterview composite score and the final categorical ranking in all 4 categories. For most comparisons, higher scores and categorical rankings were associated with applicants subsequently working in academia versus private practice. We found no problem in using our 3-step process employing virtual interviews during the COVID pandemic.
AB - From our initial screening of applications, we assess that the 10% to 15% of applicants whom we will interview are all academically qualified to complete our residency training program. This initial screening to select applicants to interview includes a personality assessment provided by the personal statement, Dean’s letter, and letters of recommendation that, taken together, begin our evaluation of the applicant’s cultural fit for our program. While the numerical scoring ranks applicants preinterview, the final ranking into best fit categories is determined solely on the interview day at a consensus conference by faculty and residents. We analyzed data of 819 applicants from 2005 to 2017. Most candidates were US medical graduates (62.5%) with 23.7% international medical graduates, 11.7% Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine (DO), and 2.1% Caribbean medical graduates. Given that personality assessment began with application review, there was excellent correlation between the preinterview composite score and the final categorical ranking in all 4 categories. For most comparisons, higher scores and categorical rankings were associated with applicants subsequently working in academia versus private practice. We found no problem in using our 3-step process employing virtual interviews during the COVID pandemic.
KW - ERAS (Electronic Residency Application Service)
KW - GME (graduate medical education)
KW - NRMP (National Resident Matching Program)
KW - applicants
KW - behavioral interview
KW - residency
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117833522&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85117833522&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/23742895211052885
DO - 10.1177/23742895211052885
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85117833522
SN - 2374-2895
VL - 8
JO - Academic Pathology
JF - Academic Pathology
ER -