TY - JOUR
T1 - Predictive models for determining treatment response to nonprescription acute medications in migraine
T2 - Results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study
AU - Ezzati, Ali
AU - Fanning, Kristina M.
AU - Buse, Dawn C.
AU - Pavlovic, Jelena M.
AU - Armand, Cynthia E.
AU - Reed, Michael L.
AU - Martin, Vincent T.
AU - Lipton, Richard B.
N1 - Funding Information:
A.E. receives research support from the following sources unrelated to this manuscript: the National Institute of Health (NIA K23 AG063993), the Alzheimer's Association (2019‐AACSF‐641329), and Cure Alzheimer Fund. Neurodiction, LLC, is fully owned by A.E. and its associated website is used for making the web‐apps developed using results of this study publicly available. A.E. or Neurodiction, LLC, has not received any funding for this work or the web‐apps that are added to its website. Neurodiction, LLC, has no financial ties with this work and the web‐apps, which are shown on these pages and are free of any advertisements or paywall. Furthermore, the codes for these web‐apps are freely available on GitHub ( https://github.com/aezzati ), which makes distribution of study results (with credit to this paper and developers) to a wider audience in a free, open‐access form possible. M.L.R. is Managing Director of Vedanta Research, which has received research funding from Allergan, Amgen, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories/Promius, and Eli Lilly, and grants from the National Headache Foundation. D.C.B. has received grant support from the Food and Drug Administration, the National Headache Foundation, and Allergan, and honoraria from Allergan, Amgen, Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis, and Teva. She serves on the editorial board of . J.M.P., MD, PhD, as a consultant and/or advisory panel member, receives honoraria from Alder Biopharmaceuticals, AbbVie, Amgen, Biohaven, and Promius. She is funded by NIH/NIA K23 AG049466‐01A1. C.E.A. has received honoraria for her participation in medical advisory board discussions with Biohaven and Impel Regional pharmaceutical companies. She serves as the web editor for . V.T.M has received honoraria from Amgen, Teva, Eli Lilly, Abbvie, and Biohaven, and has served on the advisory board for Eli Lilly, Biohaven, Teva, Abbvie, Impel, Supernus, and Lundbeck. R.B.L. receives research support from the following sources unrelated to this manuscript: NIH: 2PO1 AG003949 (mPI), 5U10 NS077308 (PI), R21 AG056920 (Investigator), 1RF1 AG057531 (Site PI), RF1 AG054548 (Investigator), 1RO1 AG048642 (Investigator), R56 AG057548 (Investigator), U01062370 (Investigator), RO1 AG060933 (Investigator), RO1 AG062622 (Investigator), 1UG3FD006795 (mPI), 1U24NS113847 (Investigator), K23 NS09610 (Mentor), K23AG049466 (Mentor), K23 NS107643 (Mentor). He also receives support from the Migraine Research Foundation and the National Headache Foundation. He serves on the editorial board of , as senior advisor to , and associate editor of . He has reviewed for the NIA and NINDS, holds stock options in eNeura Therapeutics and Biohaven Holdings, and serves as consultant, advisory board member, or has received honoraria from the following: Abbvie (Allergan), American Academy of Neurology, American Headache Society, Amgen, Avanir, Biohaven, Biovision, Boston Scientific, Dr. Reddy's (Promius), Electrocore, Eli Lilly, eNeura Therapeutics, Equinox, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Lundbeck (Alder), Merck, Pernix, Pfizer, Supernus, Teva, Trigemina, Vector, and Vedanta. He receives royalties from 7th and 8th Edition, Oxford Press University, 2009, Wiley and Informa. Current Pain and Headache Reports JAMA Neurology Neurology Headache Cephalalgia Wolff's Headache
Funding Information:
No funding was given or received for these analyses or manuscript preparation. The American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study was funded through a research grant to the National Headache Foundation (NHF) from McNeil‐Janssen Scientific Affairs LLC, Raritan, NJ (MJSA). The AMPP Study database was donated by MJSA to the NHF for use in various projects
Funding Information:
No funding was given or received for these analyses or manuscript preparation. The American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study was funded through a research grant to the National Headache Foundation (NHF) from McNeil-Janssen Scientific Affairs LLC, Raritan, NJ (MJSA). The AMPP Study database was donated by MJSA to the NHF for use in various projects
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Headache Society.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - Objective: To identify predictors of acute treatment response for nonprescription (over-the-counter [OTC]) medications among people with migraine and develop improved models for predicting treatment response. Background: Pain freedom and sustained pain relief are important priorities in the acute treatment of migraine. OTC medications are widely used for migraine; however, it is not clear which treatment works best for each patient without going through the trial and error process. Methods: A prediction model development study was completed using the 2006 American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study survey, from participants who were aged ≥18, met criteria and headache day frequency for episodic migraine, did not take prescription medication for migraine, and used ≥1 of the following acute migraine medication classes: acetaminophen, aspirin, NSAIDs, or caffeine containing combination products (CCP). Two items from the Migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire were used to evaluate treatment response, adequate 2-h pain freedom (2hPF) and 24-h pain relief (24hPR), which were defined by a response to treatment ≥half the time at 2 h and 24 h post treatment, respectively. We identified predictors of adequate treatment response and developed models to predict probability of treatment response to each medication class. Results: The sample included 3852 participants (3038 [79.0%] females) with an average age of 45.0 years (SD = 12.8). Only 1602/3852 (41.6%) and 1718/3852 (44.6%) of the participants reported adequate 2hPF and 24hPR, respectively. Adequate treatment-response was significantly predicted by lower average headache pain intensity, less cutaneous allodynia, and lower depressive symptom scores. Lower migraine symptom severity was predictive of adequate 2hPF and fewer monthly headache days was predictive of adequate 24hPR. Among participants reporting OTC monotherapy (n = 2168, 56.3%) individuals taking CCP were more likely to have adequate 2hPF (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.23–1.95) and 24hPR (OR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.18–1.88) in comparison with those taking acetaminophen. Predictive models were modestly predictive of responders to OTC medications (c-statistics = 0.65; 95% CI 0.62–0.68). Conclusion: These results show that response to acute migraine treatments is not optimized in the majority of people with migraine treating with OTC medications. Predictive models can improve our ability to choose the best therapeutic option for individuals with episodic migraine and increase the proportion of patients with optimized response to treatments.
AB - Objective: To identify predictors of acute treatment response for nonprescription (over-the-counter [OTC]) medications among people with migraine and develop improved models for predicting treatment response. Background: Pain freedom and sustained pain relief are important priorities in the acute treatment of migraine. OTC medications are widely used for migraine; however, it is not clear which treatment works best for each patient without going through the trial and error process. Methods: A prediction model development study was completed using the 2006 American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study survey, from participants who were aged ≥18, met criteria and headache day frequency for episodic migraine, did not take prescription medication for migraine, and used ≥1 of the following acute migraine medication classes: acetaminophen, aspirin, NSAIDs, or caffeine containing combination products (CCP). Two items from the Migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire were used to evaluate treatment response, adequate 2-h pain freedom (2hPF) and 24-h pain relief (24hPR), which were defined by a response to treatment ≥half the time at 2 h and 24 h post treatment, respectively. We identified predictors of adequate treatment response and developed models to predict probability of treatment response to each medication class. Results: The sample included 3852 participants (3038 [79.0%] females) with an average age of 45.0 years (SD = 12.8). Only 1602/3852 (41.6%) and 1718/3852 (44.6%) of the participants reported adequate 2hPF and 24hPR, respectively. Adequate treatment-response was significantly predicted by lower average headache pain intensity, less cutaneous allodynia, and lower depressive symptom scores. Lower migraine symptom severity was predictive of adequate 2hPF and fewer monthly headache days was predictive of adequate 24hPR. Among participants reporting OTC monotherapy (n = 2168, 56.3%) individuals taking CCP were more likely to have adequate 2hPF (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.23–1.95) and 24hPR (OR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.18–1.88) in comparison with those taking acetaminophen. Predictive models were modestly predictive of responders to OTC medications (c-statistics = 0.65; 95% CI 0.62–0.68). Conclusion: These results show that response to acute migraine treatments is not optimized in the majority of people with migraine treating with OTC medications. Predictive models can improve our ability to choose the best therapeutic option for individuals with episodic migraine and increase the proportion of patients with optimized response to treatments.
KW - digital support tools
KW - episodic migraine
KW - pain relief
KW - predictive models
KW - treatment optimization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129972366&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85129972366&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/head.14312
DO - 10.1111/head.14312
M3 - Article
C2 - 35546653
AN - SCOPUS:85129972366
SN - 0017-8748
VL - 62
SP - 755
EP - 765
JO - Headache
JF - Headache
IS - 6
ER -