TY - JOUR
T1 - Phase I clinical evaluation of seasonal influenza hemagglutinin (HA) DNA vaccine prime followed by trivalent influenza inactivated vaccine (IIV3) boost
AU - The VRC 307 and VRC 309 Study Teams
AU - Ledgerwood, Julie E.
AU - Hu, Zonghui
AU - Costner, Pamela
AU - Yamshchikov, Galina
AU - Enama, Mary E.
AU - Plummer, Sarah
AU - Hendel, Cynthia S.
AU - Holman, Lasonji
AU - Larkin, Brenda
AU - Gordon, Ingelise
AU - Bailer, Robert T.
AU - Poretz, Donald M.
AU - Sarwar, Uzma
AU - Kabadi, Alisha
AU - Koup, Richard
AU - Mascola, John R.
AU - Graham, Barney S.
AU - Novik, Laura
AU - Mendoza, Floreliz
AU - Saunders, Jamie
AU - Zephir, Kathryn
AU - Johnson, Diane
AU - Sitar, Sandra
AU - Vasilenko, Olga
AU - Casazza, Joseph
AU - Young, Sheryl
AU - Andrews, Charla
AU - Conan-Cibotti, Michelle
AU - Jones, Richard
AU - Decederfelt, Hope
AU - Starling, Judith
AU - Renehan, Phyllis
AU - Kunchai, Meghan
AU - Diep, Ly
AU - Eagel, Barry
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank the vaccine trial volunteers for their contribution and commitment to vaccine research. We acknowledge the contributions of our NIH Clinical Center and NIAID colleagues, the EMMES Corporation, colleagues at the NIAID Vaccine Research Center, especially Gary Nabel and Abraham Mittelman, colleagues at the NIAID Division of Clinical Research, especially H. Clifford Lane, Jerome Pierson and John Tierney, and assistance from Rick Stout at Bioject (Tualatin, Oregon). We also thank the NIAID Intramural IRB and NIAID Intramural Data and Safety Monitoring Board. These clinical trials were funded by the NIAID Intramural program . The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agency or collaborators.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015.
PY - 2015/9/1
Y1 - 2015/9/1
N2 - Annual influenza vaccination reduces the risks of influenza when the vaccines are well matched to circulating strains, but development of an approach that induces broader and more durable immune responses would be beneficial. We conducted two companion Phase 1 studies, VRC 307 and VRC 309, over sequential seasons (2008-2009 and 2009-2010) in which only the influenza B strain component of the vaccines differed. Objectives were safety and immunogenicity of prime-boost vaccination schedules. A schedule of DNA vaccine encoding for seasonal influenza hemagglutinins (HA) prime followed by seasonal trivalent influenza inactivated vaccine (IIV3) boost (HA DNA-IIV3) was compared to placebo (PBS)-IIV3 or IIV3-IIV3. Cumulatively, 111 adults were randomized to HA DNA-IIV3 (n = 66), PBS-IIV3 (n = 25) or IIV3-IIV3 (n = 20). Safety was assessed by clinical observations, laboratory parameters and 7-day solicited reactogenicity. The seasonal HA DNA prime-IIV3 boost regimen was evaluated as safe and well tolerated. There were no serious adverse events. The local and systemic reactogenicity for HA DNA, IIV and placebo were reported predominantly as none or mild within the first 5. days post-vaccination. There was no significant difference in immunogenicity detected between the treatment groups as evaluated by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay. The studies demonstrated the safety and immunogenicity of seasonal HA DNA-IIV3 regimen, but the 3-4. week prime-boost interval was suboptimal for improving influenza-specific immune responses. This is consistent with observations in avian H5 DNA vaccine prime-boost studies in which a long interval, but not a short interval, was associated with improved immunogenicity.Trial Registration: NCT00858611 for VRC 307 and NCT00995982 for VRC 309.
AB - Annual influenza vaccination reduces the risks of influenza when the vaccines are well matched to circulating strains, but development of an approach that induces broader and more durable immune responses would be beneficial. We conducted two companion Phase 1 studies, VRC 307 and VRC 309, over sequential seasons (2008-2009 and 2009-2010) in which only the influenza B strain component of the vaccines differed. Objectives were safety and immunogenicity of prime-boost vaccination schedules. A schedule of DNA vaccine encoding for seasonal influenza hemagglutinins (HA) prime followed by seasonal trivalent influenza inactivated vaccine (IIV3) boost (HA DNA-IIV3) was compared to placebo (PBS)-IIV3 or IIV3-IIV3. Cumulatively, 111 adults were randomized to HA DNA-IIV3 (n = 66), PBS-IIV3 (n = 25) or IIV3-IIV3 (n = 20). Safety was assessed by clinical observations, laboratory parameters and 7-day solicited reactogenicity. The seasonal HA DNA prime-IIV3 boost regimen was evaluated as safe and well tolerated. There were no serious adverse events. The local and systemic reactogenicity for HA DNA, IIV and placebo were reported predominantly as none or mild within the first 5. days post-vaccination. There was no significant difference in immunogenicity detected between the treatment groups as evaluated by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay. The studies demonstrated the safety and immunogenicity of seasonal HA DNA-IIV3 regimen, but the 3-4. week prime-boost interval was suboptimal for improving influenza-specific immune responses. This is consistent with observations in avian H5 DNA vaccine prime-boost studies in which a long interval, but not a short interval, was associated with improved immunogenicity.Trial Registration: NCT00858611 for VRC 307 and NCT00995982 for VRC 309.
KW - DNA vaccine
KW - Immune response
KW - Seasonal influenza
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939611560&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939611560&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cct.2015.08.006
DO - 10.1016/j.cct.2015.08.006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84939611560
SN - 1551-7144
VL - 44
SP - 112
EP - 118
JO - Contemporary Clinical Trials
JF - Contemporary Clinical Trials
ER -