Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: Evolution and review

Erin Schumer, Kyle Perry, William Scott Melvin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations


Esophageal cancer remains one of the most deadly cancers with a low overall 5-year survival rate of 17%. Surgical options for esophageal cancer are varied, and debate exists on the best option. The literature was searched for articles discussing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) compared with open esophagectomy (OE), and articles were chosen at the discretion of the authors. Several studies have shown that MIE has a statistically significant rate of decreased blood loss, increased length of operative time, shorter hospital stay, and overall decreased morbidity. Anastomotic leak, stricture rate, and survival benefit have also been demonstrated to be similar between OE and MIE. As is made apparent by the small amount of literature on MIE, further research must be done to determine outcomes. Although it is likely that MIE does offer benefits when compared with open surgery, it has not been shown in any large-scale comparative studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)383-386
Number of pages4
JournalSurgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques
Issue number5
StatePublished - Oct 2012
Externally publishedYes


  • esophageal cancer
  • esophagectomy
  • laparoscopic esophagectomy
  • minimally invasive esophagectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery


Dive into the research topics of 'Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: Evolution and review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this