TY - JOUR
T1 - Methodological standards and interpretation of video-electroencephalography in adult control rodents. A TASK1-WG1 report of the AES/ILAE Translational Task Force of the ILAE
AU - Kadam, Shilpa D.
AU - D'Ambrosio, Raimondo
AU - Duveau, Venceslas
AU - Roucard, Corinne
AU - Garcia-Cairasco, Norberto
AU - Ikeda, Akio
AU - de Curtis, Marco
AU - Galanopoulou, Aristea S.
AU - Kelly, Kevin M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This report was written by experts selected by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and the American Epilepsy Society (AES) and was approved for publication by the ILAE and the AES. Opinions expressed by the authors, however, do not necessarily represent the policy or position of the ILAE or the AES. We are also grateful to the AES and ILAE for partially sponsoring the activities of the AES/ILAE Translational Task Force of the ILAE. Reference to websites, products, or systems that are being used for EEG acquisition, storage, or analysis was based on the resources known to the coauthors of this article and is done only for informational purposes. The AES/ILAE Translational Task Force of the ILAE is a nonprofit society that does not preferentially endorse certain of these resources; it is the readers’ responsibility to determine the appropriateness of these resources for their specific intended experimental purposes. Shilpa D. Kadam, Norberto Garcia-Cairasco, Marco de Curtis, Aristea S. Galano-poulou, and Kevin M. Kelly report no conflicts of interests. Akio Ikeda acknowledges departmental grants from GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Nihon Kohden Cooperation, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals Co., and UCB Japan Co. Raimondo D’Ambrosio is cofounder and equity holder in Therma Neurosciences. Venceslas Duveau and Corinne Roucard are employees of Synap-Cell (http://www.synapcell.fr/). There are no financial relationships to relevant to this article. We confirm that we have read the Journal’s position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.
Funding Information:
The authors are grateful to Lauren Harte-Hargrove for assistance in the preparation of this article. Shilpa D. Kadam acknowledges grant support by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R21HD073105. Raimondo D’Ambrosio acknowledges grant support by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) R21 NS085459. Norberto Garcia-Cairasco acknowledges grant support by FAPESP-Brazil grant 2007/50261-4. Aristea S. Galanopoulou acknowledges grant support by NINDS RO1 NS091170, U54 NS100064, the U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-13-1-0180), and the CURE Infantile Spasms Initiative and research funding from the Heffer Family and the Segal Family Foundations and the Abbe Goldstein/Joshua Lurie and Laurie Marsh/Dan Levitz Families. Aristea S. Galanopoulou is co-Editor in Chief of Epilepsia Open. Kevin M. Kelly acknowledges grant support by Department of Defense Contract 12097010 and NINDS 2R44 NS064647-05A1.
Publisher Copyright:
Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 International League Against Epilepsy
PY - 2017/11
Y1 - 2017/11
N2 - In vivo electrophysiological recordings are widely used in neuroscience research, and video-electroencephalography (vEEG) has become a mainstay of preclinical neuroscience research, including studies of epilepsy and cognition. Studies utilizing vEEG typically involve comparison of measurements obtained from different experimental groups, or from the same experimental group at different times, in which one set of measurements serves as “control” and the others as “test” of the variables of interest. Thus, controls provide mainly a reference measurement for the experimental test. Control rodents represent an undiagnosed population, and cannot be assumed to be “normal” in the sense of being “healthy.” Certain physiological EEG patterns seen in humans are also seen in control rodents. However, interpretation of rodent vEEG studies relies on documented differences in frequency, morphology, type, location, behavioral state dependence, reactivity, and functional or structural correlates of specific EEG patterns and features between control and test groups. This paper will focus on the vEEG of standard laboratory rodent strains with the aim of developing a small set of practical guidelines that can assist researchers in the design, reporting, and interpretation of future vEEG studies. To this end, we will: (1) discuss advantages and pitfalls of common vEEG techniques in rodents and propose a set of recommended practices and (2) present EEG patterns and associated behaviors recorded from adult rats of a variety of strains. We will describe the defining features of selected vEEG patterns (brain-generated or artifactual) and note similarities to vEEG patterns seen in adult humans. We will note similarities to normal variants or pathological human EEG patterns and defer their interpretation to a future report focusing on rodent seizure patterns.
AB - In vivo electrophysiological recordings are widely used in neuroscience research, and video-electroencephalography (vEEG) has become a mainstay of preclinical neuroscience research, including studies of epilepsy and cognition. Studies utilizing vEEG typically involve comparison of measurements obtained from different experimental groups, or from the same experimental group at different times, in which one set of measurements serves as “control” and the others as “test” of the variables of interest. Thus, controls provide mainly a reference measurement for the experimental test. Control rodents represent an undiagnosed population, and cannot be assumed to be “normal” in the sense of being “healthy.” Certain physiological EEG patterns seen in humans are also seen in control rodents. However, interpretation of rodent vEEG studies relies on documented differences in frequency, morphology, type, location, behavioral state dependence, reactivity, and functional or structural correlates of specific EEG patterns and features between control and test groups. This paper will focus on the vEEG of standard laboratory rodent strains with the aim of developing a small set of practical guidelines that can assist researchers in the design, reporting, and interpretation of future vEEG studies. To this end, we will: (1) discuss advantages and pitfalls of common vEEG techniques in rodents and propose a set of recommended practices and (2) present EEG patterns and associated behaviors recorded from adult rats of a variety of strains. We will describe the defining features of selected vEEG patterns (brain-generated or artifactual) and note similarities to vEEG patterns seen in adult humans. We will note similarities to normal variants or pathological human EEG patterns and defer their interpretation to a future report focusing on rodent seizure patterns.
KW - Electroencephalography
KW - Electromyography
KW - Naive control
KW - Rodents
KW - Video-electroencephalography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033381058&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033381058&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/epi.13903
DO - 10.1111/epi.13903
M3 - Article
C2 - 29105073
AN - SCOPUS:85033381058
SN - 0013-9580
VL - 58
SP - 10
EP - 27
JO - Epilepsia
JF - Epilepsia
ER -