TY - JOUR
T1 - Linezolid pharmacokinetics in South African patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis and a high prevalence of HIV coinfection
AU - Wasserman, Sean
AU - Denti, Paolo
AU - Brust, James C.M.
AU - Abdelwahab, Mahmoud
AU - Hlungulu, Siphokazi
AU - Wiesner, Lubbe
AU - Norman, Jennifer
AU - Sirgel, Frederick A.
AU - Warren, Robin M.
AU - Esmail, Aliasgar
AU - Dheda, Keertan
AU - Gandhi, Neel R.
AU - Meintjes, Graeme
AU - Maartens, Gary
N1 - Funding Information:
supported in part by the NRF incentive funding (UID: 85810). The University of Cape Town (UCT) Clinical PK Laboratory is supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers UM1 AI068634, UM1 AI068636, and UM1 AI106701.
Funding Information:
S. Wasserman is supported by the European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (CDF1018) and the Wellcome Trust (203135/Z/16/Z). J. C. M. Bust is supported by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (R01AI114304 and P30AI124414). G. Meintjes was supported by the Wellcome Trust (098316 and 203135/Z/16/Z), the South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa (grant no. 64787), NRF incentive funding (UID 85858), and the South African Medical Research Council through its TB and HIV Collaborating Centres Program with funds received from the National Department of Health (RFA SAMRC-RFA-CC: TB/HIV/AIDS-01-2014). A. Esmail is supported by the European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (TMA2015). K. Dheda is supported by the SA MRC, SA NRF, and the EDCTP. N. R. Gandhi received funding from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (R01AI114304 and K24AI114444). G. Maartens was supported in part by the NRF incentive funding (UID: 85810). The University of Cape Town (UCT) Clinical PK Laboratory is supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers UM1 AI068634, UM1 AI068636, and UM1 AI106701. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of this report. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed reflect those of the authors alone.
Funding Information:
S. Wasserman is supported by the European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (CDF1018) and the Wellcome Trust (203135/Z/16/Z). J. C. M. Bust is supported by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (R01AI114304 and P30AI124414). G. Meintjes was supported by the Wellcome Trust (098316 and 203135/Z/16/Z), the South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa (grant no. 64787), NRF incentive funding (UID 85858), and the South African Medical Research Council through its TB and HIV Collaborating Centres Program with funds received from the National Department of Health (RFA SAMRC-RFA-CC: TB/HIV/AIDS-01-2014). A. Esmail is supported by the European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (TMA2015). K. Dheda is supported by the SA MRC, SA NRF, and the EDCTP. N. R. Gandhi received funding from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (R01AI114304 and K24AI114444). G. Maartens was
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - The World Health Organization (WHO) recently recommended that linezolid be prioritized in treatment regimens for drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB), but there are limited data on its pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients with this disease. We conducted an observational study to explore covariate effects on linezolid PK and to estimate the probability of PK/pharmacodynamic target attainment in South African patients with drug-resistant TB. Consecutive adults on linezolid-based regimens were recruited in Cape Town and underwent intensive PK sampling at steady state. Non-compartmental analysis was performed. Thirty participants were included: 15 HIV positive, 26 on the initial dose of 600 mg daily, and 4 participants on 300 mg daily after dose reduction for linezolid-related toxicity. There was a negative correlation between body weight and exposure, with 17.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1 to 31.7) decrease in area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0 –24) per 10-kg weight increment after adjustment for other covariates. Age was an independent predictor of trough concentration, with an estimated 43.4% (95% CI, 5.9 to 94.2) increase per 10-year increment in age. The standard 600-mg dose achieved the efficacy target of free AUC/MIC of 119 at wild-type MIC values (0.5 mg/liter), but the probability of target attainment dropped to 61.5% (95% CI, 40.6 to 79.8) at the critical concentration of 1 mg/liter. When dosed at 600 mg daily, trough concentrations were above the toxicity threshold of 2 mg/liter in 57.7% (95% CI, 36.9 to 76.6). This confirms the narrow therapeutic index of linezolid, and alternative dosing strategies should be explored.
AB - The World Health Organization (WHO) recently recommended that linezolid be prioritized in treatment regimens for drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB), but there are limited data on its pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients with this disease. We conducted an observational study to explore covariate effects on linezolid PK and to estimate the probability of PK/pharmacodynamic target attainment in South African patients with drug-resistant TB. Consecutive adults on linezolid-based regimens were recruited in Cape Town and underwent intensive PK sampling at steady state. Non-compartmental analysis was performed. Thirty participants were included: 15 HIV positive, 26 on the initial dose of 600 mg daily, and 4 participants on 300 mg daily after dose reduction for linezolid-related toxicity. There was a negative correlation between body weight and exposure, with 17.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1 to 31.7) decrease in area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0 –24) per 10-kg weight increment after adjustment for other covariates. Age was an independent predictor of trough concentration, with an estimated 43.4% (95% CI, 5.9 to 94.2) increase per 10-year increment in age. The standard 600-mg dose achieved the efficacy target of free AUC/MIC of 119 at wild-type MIC values (0.5 mg/liter), but the probability of target attainment dropped to 61.5% (95% CI, 40.6 to 79.8) at the critical concentration of 1 mg/liter. When dosed at 600 mg daily, trough concentrations were above the toxicity threshold of 2 mg/liter in 57.7% (95% CI, 36.9 to 76.6). This confirms the narrow therapeutic index of linezolid, and alternative dosing strategies should be explored.
KW - Drug-resistant tuberculosis
KW - Linezolid
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062283270&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062283270&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1128/AAC.02164-18
DO - 10.1128/AAC.02164-18
M3 - Article
C2 - 30617089
AN - SCOPUS:85062283270
SN - 0066-4804
VL - 63
JO - Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy
JF - Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy
IS - 3
M1 - e02164-18
ER -