Interim Safety Profile from the Feasibility Study of the BrainGate Neural Interface System

Daniel B. Rubin, A. Bolu Ajiboye, Laurie Barefoot, Marguerite Bowker, Sydney S. Cash, David Chen, John P. Donoghue, Emad N. Eskandar, Gerhard Friehs, Carol Grant, Jaimie M. Henderson, Robert F. Kirsch, Rose Marujo, Maryam Masood, Stephen T. Mernoff, Jonathan P. Miller, Jon A. Mukand, Richard D. Penn, Jeremy Shefner, Krishna V. ShenoyJohn D. Simeral, Jennifer A. Sweet, Benjamin L. Walter, Ziv M. Williams, Leigh R. Hochberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and ObjectivesBrain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are being developed to restore mobility, communication, and functional independence to people with paralysis. Though supported by decades of preclinical data, the safety of chronically implanted microelectrode array BCIs in humans is unknown. We report safety results from the prospective, open-label, nonrandomized BrainGate feasibility study (NCT00912041), the largest and longest-running clinical trial of an implanted BCI.MethodsAdults aged 18-75 years with quadriparesis from spinal cord injury, brainstem stroke, or motor neuron disease were enrolled through 7 clinical sites in the United States. Participants underwent surgical implantation of 1 or 2 microelectrode arrays in the motor cortex of the dominant cerebral hemisphere. The primary safety outcome was device-related serious adverse events (SAEs) requiring device explantation or resulting in death or permanently increased disability during the 1-year postimplant evaluation period. The secondary outcomes included the type and frequency of other adverse events and the feasibility of the BrainGate system for controlling a computer or other assistive technologies.ResultsFrom 2004 to 2021, 14 adults enrolled in the BrainGate trial had devices surgically implanted. The average duration of device implantation was 872 days, yielding 12,203 days of safety experience. There were 68 device-related adverse events, including 6 device-related SAEs. The most common device-related adverse event was skin irritation around the percutaneous pedestal. There were no safety events that required device explantation, no unanticipated adverse device events, no intracranial infections, and no participant deaths or adverse events resulting in permanently increased disability related to the investigational device.DiscussionThe BrainGate Neural Interface system has a safety record comparable with other chronically implanted medical devices. Given rapid recent advances in this technology and continued performance gains, these data suggest a favorable risk/benefit ratio in appropriately selected individuals to support ongoing research and development.Trial Registration InformationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00912041.Classification of EvidenceThis study provides Class IV evidence that the neurosurgically placed BrainGate Neural Interface system is associated with a low rate of SAEs defined as those requiring device explantation, resulting in death, or resulting in permanently increased disability during the 1-year postimplant period.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E1177-E1192
JournalNeurology
Volume100
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 14 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interim Safety Profile from the Feasibility Study of the BrainGate Neural Interface System'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this