TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving the quality of primary care by optimizing implementation research reporting
AU - The StaRI Group
AU - Grandes, Gonzalo
AU - Pinnock, Hilary
AU - Bazemore, Andrew
AU - Meissner, Paul
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society (ACES). All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2018/5/1
Y1 - 2018/5/1
N2 - The potential of implementation research in understanding strategies for changing practice is undermined by poor reporting, leaving readers unable to replicate such strategies and unclear whether they apply in the context of their practice. These challenges are particularly pertinent in the complex, diverse world of primary care. The recently published Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) provides a framework for comprehensive reporting of implementation research. A key concept is the consideration and reporting in “dual strands”: on the one hand, the implementation strategy and on the other, the evidence-based intervention. Other requirements are full descriptions of context, strategies and interventions (and how the strategies were adopted or adapted), and evaluation methods, which will require flexible interpretation of journal limit constraints or innovative approaches to supplementary information. The choice is between accepting the unsatisfactory status quo or adopting strategies to improve reporting with a view to optimizing the potential of implementation research to advance primary care.
AB - The potential of implementation research in understanding strategies for changing practice is undermined by poor reporting, leaving readers unable to replicate such strategies and unclear whether they apply in the context of their practice. These challenges are particularly pertinent in the complex, diverse world of primary care. The recently published Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) provides a framework for comprehensive reporting of implementation research. A key concept is the consideration and reporting in “dual strands”: on the one hand, the implementation strategy and on the other, the evidence-based intervention. Other requirements are full descriptions of context, strategies and interventions (and how the strategies were adopted or adapted), and evaluation methods, which will require flexible interpretation of journal limit constraints or innovative approaches to supplementary information. The choice is between accepting the unsatisfactory status quo or adopting strategies to improve reporting with a view to optimizing the potential of implementation research to advance primary care.
KW - Implementation Science, Primary Health Care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047368295&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047368295&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170195
DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170195
M3 - Article
C2 - 29743231
AN - SCOPUS:85047368295
SN - 1557-2625
VL - 31
SP - 484
EP - 487
JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
IS - 3
ER -