TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving Interprofessional Consistency in Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation
AU - Govindappagari, Shravya
AU - Zaghi, Sahar
AU - Zannat, Ferdous
AU - Reimers, Laura
AU - Goffman, Dena
AU - Kassel, Irene
AU - Bernstein, Peter S.
PY - 2015/12/28
Y1 - 2015/12/28
N2 - Objective To determine if mandatory online training in electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) improved agreement in documentation between obstetric care providers and nurses on labor and delivery. Methods Health care professionals working in obstetrics at our institution were required to complete a course on EFM interpretation. We performed a retrospective chart review of 701 charts including patients delivered before and after the introduction of the course to evaluate agreement among providers in their documentation of their interpretations of the EFM tracings. Results Agreement between provider and nurse documentation at the time of admission improved for variability and accelerations (variability: 91.1 vs. 98.3%, p <0.001; and accelerations: 75.2 vs. 87.7%, p <0.001). Similarly, agreement improved at the time of the last note prior to delivery for documentation of variability and accelerations (variability: 82.1 vs. 90.6%, p = 0.001; and accelerations: 56.7 vs. 68.6%, p = 0.0012). Agreement in interpretation of decelerations both at the time of admission and at the time of delivery increased (86.3 vs. 90.6%, p = 0.0787, and 56.7 vs. 61.1%, p = 0.2314, respectively) but was not significant. Conclusion An online EFM course can significantly improve consistency in multidisciplinary documentation of fetal heart rate tracing interpretation.
AB - Objective To determine if mandatory online training in electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) improved agreement in documentation between obstetric care providers and nurses on labor and delivery. Methods Health care professionals working in obstetrics at our institution were required to complete a course on EFM interpretation. We performed a retrospective chart review of 701 charts including patients delivered before and after the introduction of the course to evaluate agreement among providers in their documentation of their interpretations of the EFM tracings. Results Agreement between provider and nurse documentation at the time of admission improved for variability and accelerations (variability: 91.1 vs. 98.3%, p <0.001; and accelerations: 75.2 vs. 87.7%, p <0.001). Similarly, agreement improved at the time of the last note prior to delivery for documentation of variability and accelerations (variability: 82.1 vs. 90.6%, p = 0.001; and accelerations: 56.7 vs. 68.6%, p = 0.0012). Agreement in interpretation of decelerations both at the time of admission and at the time of delivery increased (86.3 vs. 90.6%, p = 0.0787, and 56.7 vs. 61.1%, p = 0.2314, respectively) but was not significant. Conclusion An online EFM course can significantly improve consistency in multidisciplinary documentation of fetal heart rate tracing interpretation.
KW - accelerations
KW - consistency
KW - decelerations
KW - electronic fetal monitoring
KW - variability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959066583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959066583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1055/s-0036-1572540
DO - 10.1055/s-0036-1572540
M3 - Article
C2 - 26906180
AN - SCOPUS:84959066583
SN - 0735-1631
JO - American Journal of Perinatology
JF - American Journal of Perinatology
ER -