Abstract
Background: A positive association between circulating Creactive protein (CRP) and colorectal cancer survival was reported in observational studies, which are susceptible to unmeasured confounding and reverse causality.Weused a Mendelian randomization approach to evaluate the association between genetically predicted CRP concentrations and colorectal cancer-specific survival. Methods: We used individual-level data for 16,918 eligible colorectal cancer cases of European ancestry from 15 studies within the International Survival Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Consortium. Wecalculated a genetic-risk score based on 52 CRP-associated genetic variants identified from genome-wide association studies. Because of the non-collapsibility of hazard ratios from Cox proportional hazards models, we used the additive hazards model to calculate hazard differences (HD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between genetically predicted CRP concentrations and colorectal cancer-specific survival, overall and by stage at diagnosis and tumor location. Analyses were adjusted for age at diagnosis, sex, body mass index, genotyping platform, study, and principal components. Results: Of the 5,395 (32%) deaths accrued over up to 10 years of follow-up, 3,808 (23%) were due to colorectal cancer. Genetically predicted CRP concentration was not associated with colorectal cancer-specific survival (HD, 1.15; 95% CI, 2.76 to 0.47 per 100,000 person-years; P = 0.16). Similarly, no associations were observed in subgroup analyses by stage at diagnosis or tumor location. Conclusions: Despite adequate power to detect moderate associations, our results did not support a causal effect of circulating CRP concentrations on colorectal cancer-specific survival.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1349-1358 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 7 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 2021 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Medicine(all)
Access to Document
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Genetically predicted circulating c-reactive protein concentration and colorectal cancer survival: A mendelian randomization consortium study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
In: Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, Vol. 30, No. 7, 07.2021, p. 1349-1358.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Genetically predicted circulating c-reactive protein concentration and colorectal cancer survival
T2 - A mendelian randomization consortium study
AU - Hua, Xinwei
AU - Dai, James Y.
AU - Lindstrom, Sara
AU - Harrison, Tabitha A.
AU - Lin, Yi
AU - Alberts, Steven R.
AU - Alwers, Elizabeth
AU - Berndt, Sonja I.
AU - Brenner, Hermann
AU - Buchanan, Daniel D.
AU - Campbell, Peter T.
AU - Casey, Graham
AU - Chang-Claude, Jenny
AU - Gallinger, Steven
AU - Giles, Graham G.
AU - Goldberg, Richard M.
AU - Gunter, Marc J.
AU - Hoffmeister, Michael
AU - Jenkins, Mark A.
AU - Joshi, Amit D.
AU - Ma, Wenjie
AU - Milne, Roger L.
AU - Murphy, Neil
AU - Pai, Rish K.
AU - Sakoda, Lori C.
AU - Schoen, Robert E.
AU - Shi, Qian
AU - Slattery, Martha L.
AU - Song, Mingyang
AU - White, Emily
AU - Le Marchand, Loic
AU - Chan, Andrew T.
AU - Peters, Ulrike
AU - Newcomb, Polly A.
N1 - Funding Information: ISACC: The authors would like to thank all those at the ISACC Coordinating Center for helping bring together the data and people that made this project possible. This research was funded by in part through National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (R01 CA176272) and the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support grant P30 CA015704. Scientific Computing Infrastructure at Fred Hutch funded by ORIP grant S10OD028685. CCFR: The Colon CFR graciously thanks the generous contributions of their 42,505 study participants, dedication of study staff, and the financial support from the U.S. National Cancer Institute, without which this important registry would not exist. CCFR (www. coloncfr.org) is supported in part by funding from the National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH; award U01 CA167551). The CCFR Set-1 (Illumina 1M/1M-Duo) and Set-2 (Illumina Omni1-Quad) scans were supported by NIH awards U01 CA122839 and R01 CA143247 (to G. Casey). The CCFR Set-3 (Affymetrix Axiom CORECT Set array) was supported by NIH award U19 CA148107 and R01 CA81488 (to SBG). The CCFR Set-4 (Illumina OncoArray 600K SNP array) was supported by NIH award U19 CA148107 and by the Center for Inherited Disease Research (CIDR), which is funded by the NIH to the Johns Hopkins University, contract number HHSN268201200008I. The content of this article does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the NCI, NIH, or any of the collaborating centers in the Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR), nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. government, any cancer registry, or the CCFR. SCCFR: The authors would like to thank the study participants and staff of the Seattle Colon Cancer Family Registry and the Hormones and Colon Cancer study (CORE Studies). [OFCCR ARCTIC]: Additional funding for the OFCCR/ARCTIC was through award GL201-043 from the Ontario Research Fund, award 112746 from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research through a Cancer Risk Evaluation (CaRE) Program grant from the Canadian Cancer Society (to S. Gallinger), and through generous support from the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation. [SCCFR (Illumina HumanCytoSNP (300k)]: The SCCFR Illumina HumanCytoSNP array was supported through NCI award R01 CA076366 (to P.A. Newcomb). [CCFR Set-1 and/or Set-2 scan (Illumina Human 1M, 1M-Duo, and/or Omni1-Quad)]: The CCFR Set-1 (Illumina 1M/1M-Duo) and Set-2 (Illumina Omni1-Quad) scans were supported by NIH awards U01 CA122839 and R01 CA143247 (to G. Casey). [CCFR Set-3 scan (Affymetrix Axiom CORECT Set array)]: The CCFR Set-3 (Affymetrix Axiom CORECT Set array) was supported by NIH award U19 CA148107 and R01 CA81488 (to SBG). [CCFR Set-4 scan (Illumina OncoArray 600K SNP array)]: The CCFR Set-4 (Illumina OncoArray 600K SNP array) was supported by NIH award U19 CA148107 (to SBG) and by the Center for Inherited Disease Research (CIDR), which is funded by the NIH to the Johns Hopkins University, contract number HHSN268201200008I. CPS-II: The authors thank the CPS-II participants and Study Management Group for their invaluable contributions to this research. The authors would also like to acknowledge the contribution to this study from central cancer registries supported through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Program of Cancer Registries, and cancer registries supported by the National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results program. The American Cancer Society funds the creation, maintenance, and updating of the CPS-II cohort. This study was conducted with Institutional Review Board approval. DACHS: We thank all participants and cooperating clinicians, and everyone who provided excellent technical assistance. This work was supported by the German Research Council (BR 1704/6-1, BR 1704/6-3, BR1704/6-4, CH 117/1-1, HO 5117/2-1, HE 5998/2-1, KL 2354/3-1, RO 2270/8-1 and BR 1704/17-1), the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01KH0404, 01ER0814, 01ER0815, 01ER1505A, and 01ER1505B), the Interdisciplinary Research Program of the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Germany, and German Cancer Research Center. DALS: National Institutes of Health (R01 CA48998; to M.L. Slattery). EDRN: We acknowledge all contributors to the development of the resource at University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, Department of Pathology, Hepatology and Nutrition and Biomedical Informatics. This work is funded and supported by the NCI, EDRN Grant (U01 CA 84968-06). EPIC: Where authors are identified as personnel of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization, the authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy or views of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization. EPIC is financially supported by the European Commission (DGSANCO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The national cohorts are supported by Danish Cancer Society (Denmark); Ligue Contre le Cancer, Institut Gustave Roussy, Mutuelle Générale de l’Education Nationale, Institut National de la Santéet de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM; France); German Cancer Aid, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Deutsche Krebshilfe, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum and Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany); the Hellenic Health Foundation (Greece); Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro-AIRCItaly and National Research Council (Italy); Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports (VWS), Netherlands Cancer Registry (NKR), LK Research Funds, Dutch Prevention Funds, Dutch ZON (Zorg Onderzoek Nederland), World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF), Statistics Netherlands (the Netherlands); ERC-2009-AdG 232997 and Nordforsk, Nordic Center of Excellence program on Food, Nutrition and Health (Norway); Health Research Fund (FIS), PI13/00061 to Granada, PI13/01162 to EPIC-Murcia, Regional Governments of Andalucía, Asturias, Basque Country, Murcia and Navarra, ISCIII RETIC (RD06/0020; Spain); Swedish Cancer Society, Swedish Research Council and County Councils of Ska°ne and V€asterbotten (Sweden); Cancer Research Funding Information: G. Casey reports grants from NIH during the conduct of the study, as well as grants from NIH outside the submitted work. G.G. Giles reports grants from National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) during the conduct of the study. R.M. Goldberg reports grants from National Cancer Institute during the conduct of the study, as well as personal fees from Amgen, Taiho, AstraZeneca, Merck, Novartis, Genentech, Adaptimmune, and Bayer outside the submitted work. R.K. Pai reports personal fees from PathAI, Alimentiv Inc., Allergan, Eli Lilly, AbbVie, and Genentech outside the submitted work. L.C. Sakoda reports grants from National Cancer Institute during the conduct of the study, as well as grants from National Cancer Institute outside the submitted work. R.E. Schoen reports grants from NIH during the conduct of the study. Q. Shi reports personal fees from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Merck & Co.; grants from Roche/Genentech and BMS/Celgene; and personal fees from Yiviva Inc., Johnson & Johnson, and Amgen outside the submitted work. M.L. Slattery reports grants from National Cancer Institute during the conduct of the study. L. Le Marchand reports grants from NCI during the conduct of the study. A.T. Chan reports personal fees from Bayer Pharma AG, Pfizer Inc., and Boehringer Ingelheim outside the submitted work. No disclosures were reported by the other authors. Funding Information: UK (14136 to EPIC-Norfolk; C570/A16491 and C8221/A19170 to EPIC-Oxford), Medical Research Council (1000143 to EPIC-Norfolk, MR/M012190/1 to EPICOx-ford, UK). Harvard cohorts (HPFS, NHS, and PHS): The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of the Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, and those of participating registries as required. We would like to thank the participants and staff of the HPFS, NHS, and PHS for their valuable contributions as well as the following state cancer registries for their help: AL, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, NE, NH, NJ, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VA, WA, WY. The authors assume full responsibility for analyses and interpretation of these data. HPFS is supported by the National Institutes of Health (P01 CA055075, UM1 CA167552, U01 CA167552, R01 CA137178, R01 CA151993, and R35 CA197735), NHS by the National Institutes of Health (R01 CA137178, P01 CA087969, UM1 CA186107, R01 CA151993, and R35 CA197735), and PHS by the National Institutes of Health (R01 CA042182). MCCS cohort recruitment was funded by VicHealth and Cancer Council Victoria. The MCCS was further supported by Australian NHMRC grants 509348, 209057, 251553, and 504711 and by infrastructure provided by Cancer Council Victoria. Cases and their vital status were ascertained through the Victorian Cancer Registry (VCR) and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), including the National Death Index and the Australian Cancer Database. PLCO: The authors thank the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial screening center investigators and the staff from Information Management Services Inc. and Westat Inc. Most importantly, we thank the study participants for their contributions that made this study possible. Cancer incidence data have been provided by the District of Columbia Cancer Registry, Georgia Cancer Registry, Hawaii Cancer Registry, Minnesota Cancer Surveillance System, Missouri Cancer Registry, Nevada Central Cancer Registry, Pennsylvania Cancer Registry, Texas Cancer Registry, Virginia Cancer Registry, and Wisconsin Cancer Reporting System. All are supported in part by funds from the Publisher Copyright: © 2021 American Association for Cancer Research Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Background: A positive association between circulating Creactive protein (CRP) and colorectal cancer survival was reported in observational studies, which are susceptible to unmeasured confounding and reverse causality.Weused a Mendelian randomization approach to evaluate the association between genetically predicted CRP concentrations and colorectal cancer-specific survival. Methods: We used individual-level data for 16,918 eligible colorectal cancer cases of European ancestry from 15 studies within the International Survival Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Consortium. Wecalculated a genetic-risk score based on 52 CRP-associated genetic variants identified from genome-wide association studies. Because of the non-collapsibility of hazard ratios from Cox proportional hazards models, we used the additive hazards model to calculate hazard differences (HD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between genetically predicted CRP concentrations and colorectal cancer-specific survival, overall and by stage at diagnosis and tumor location. Analyses were adjusted for age at diagnosis, sex, body mass index, genotyping platform, study, and principal components. Results: Of the 5,395 (32%) deaths accrued over up to 10 years of follow-up, 3,808 (23%) were due to colorectal cancer. Genetically predicted CRP concentration was not associated with colorectal cancer-specific survival (HD, 1.15; 95% CI, 2.76 to 0.47 per 100,000 person-years; P = 0.16). Similarly, no associations were observed in subgroup analyses by stage at diagnosis or tumor location. Conclusions: Despite adequate power to detect moderate associations, our results did not support a causal effect of circulating CRP concentrations on colorectal cancer-specific survival.
AB - Background: A positive association between circulating Creactive protein (CRP) and colorectal cancer survival was reported in observational studies, which are susceptible to unmeasured confounding and reverse causality.Weused a Mendelian randomization approach to evaluate the association between genetically predicted CRP concentrations and colorectal cancer-specific survival. Methods: We used individual-level data for 16,918 eligible colorectal cancer cases of European ancestry from 15 studies within the International Survival Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Consortium. Wecalculated a genetic-risk score based on 52 CRP-associated genetic variants identified from genome-wide association studies. Because of the non-collapsibility of hazard ratios from Cox proportional hazards models, we used the additive hazards model to calculate hazard differences (HD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between genetically predicted CRP concentrations and colorectal cancer-specific survival, overall and by stage at diagnosis and tumor location. Analyses were adjusted for age at diagnosis, sex, body mass index, genotyping platform, study, and principal components. Results: Of the 5,395 (32%) deaths accrued over up to 10 years of follow-up, 3,808 (23%) were due to colorectal cancer. Genetically predicted CRP concentration was not associated with colorectal cancer-specific survival (HD, 1.15; 95% CI, 2.76 to 0.47 per 100,000 person-years; P = 0.16). Similarly, no associations were observed in subgroup analyses by stage at diagnosis or tumor location. Conclusions: Despite adequate power to detect moderate associations, our results did not support a causal effect of circulating CRP concentrations on colorectal cancer-specific survival.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109076361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85109076361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1848
DO - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1848
M3 - Article
C2 - 33972368
AN - SCOPUS:85109076361
SN - 1055-9965
VL - 30
SP - 1349
EP - 1358
JO - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
JF - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
IS - 7
ER -