Evaluation of the Safety of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (BVS) Implantation in Patients with Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions: Acute Procedural and Short-Term Clinical Results

Omer Goktekin, Aylin Hatice Yamac, Azeem Latib, Ahmet Tastan, Vasileios F. Panoulas, Katsumasa Sato, Ercan Erdogan, Huseyin Uyarel, Ibrahim Shah, Antonio Colombo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

AIMS: The bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) (Abbott Vascular) provides temporary scaffolding while eluting everolimus. There are limited data on its use in daily practice, especially in patients with stable angina pectoris referred for elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusions (CTOs). The current study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of BVS implantation in a selected patient cohort with CTO. METHODS: A total of 70 consecutive patients, who underwent successful recanalization of CTO with BVS between September 13, 2012 and September 20, 2014 in three cardiac centers (Department of Cardiology, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Interventional Cardiology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; and EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus, Milan, Italy) were included in this CTO registry. Endpoints analyzed included: (1) the composite of all-cause death and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI); and (2) the composite safety endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including death, MI and symptom-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). RESULTS: Clinical data were obtained for 70 patients (mean age, 56.9 ± 9.4 years; 90.0% male) with a total number of 76 CTOs. At a median follow-up of 11.0 months (interquartile range, 7-18 months), both MACE and TLR rates were 4.3%. Two patients suffered from ischemia-driven TLR (1 patient at 6 months and 1 patient at 9 months after implantation). No death, MI, or stent thrombosis was observed during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Treatment of CTOs with BVS seems to be safe and effective, with a high technical success rate and acceptable MACE at short-term follow-up.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)461-466
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Invasive Cardiology
Volume27
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • bioresorbable vascular scaffold
  • chronic total occlusion
  • efficacy and safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of the Safety of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (BVS) Implantation in Patients with Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions: Acute Procedural and Short-Term Clinical Results'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this