TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimated risk of cardiovascular disease and secondary cancers with modern highly conformal radiotherapy for early-stage mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma
AU - Maraldo, M. V.
AU - Brodin, N. P.
AU - Aznar, M. C.
AU - Vogelius, I. R.
AU - Munck af Rosenschöld, P.
AU - Petersen, P. M.
AU - Specht, L.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Rigshospitalet Scientific Committee.
PY - 2013/8
Y1 - 2013/8
N2 - Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors have an increased morbidity and mortality from secondary cancers and cardiovascular disease (CD). We evaluate doses with involved node radiotherapy (INRT) delivered as 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), or proton therapy (PT), compared with the extensive Mantle Field (MF). Patients and methods: For 27 patients with early-stage, mediastinal HL, treated with chemotherapy and INRT delivered as 3D CRT (30 Gy), we simulated an MF (36 Gy), INRT-VMAT and INRT-PT (30 Gy). Dose to the heart, lungs, and breasts, estimated risks of CD, lung (LC) and breast cancer (BC), and corresponding life years lost (LYL) were compared. Results: 3D CRT, VMAT or PT significantly lower the dose to the heart, lungs and breasts and provide lower risk estimates compared with MF, but with substantial patient variability. The risk of CD is not significantly different for 3D CRT versus VMAT. The risk of LC and BC is highest with VMAT. For LYL, PT is the superior modern technique. Conclusions: In early-stage, mediastinal HL modern radiotherapy provides superior results compared with MF. However, there is no single best radiotherapy technique for HL-the decision should be made at the individual patient level.
AB - Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors have an increased morbidity and mortality from secondary cancers and cardiovascular disease (CD). We evaluate doses with involved node radiotherapy (INRT) delivered as 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), or proton therapy (PT), compared with the extensive Mantle Field (MF). Patients and methods: For 27 patients with early-stage, mediastinal HL, treated with chemotherapy and INRT delivered as 3D CRT (30 Gy), we simulated an MF (36 Gy), INRT-VMAT and INRT-PT (30 Gy). Dose to the heart, lungs, and breasts, estimated risks of CD, lung (LC) and breast cancer (BC), and corresponding life years lost (LYL) were compared. Results: 3D CRT, VMAT or PT significantly lower the dose to the heart, lungs and breasts and provide lower risk estimates compared with MF, but with substantial patient variability. The risk of CD is not significantly different for 3D CRT versus VMAT. The risk of LC and BC is highest with VMAT. For LYL, PT is the superior modern technique. Conclusions: In early-stage, mediastinal HL modern radiotherapy provides superior results compared with MF. However, there is no single best radiotherapy technique for HL-the decision should be made at the individual patient level.
KW - Cardiovascular disease
KW - Highly conformal radiotherapy
KW - Hodgkin lymphoma
KW - Involved node radiotherapy
KW - Secondary cancers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881239116&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881239116&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/annonc/mdt156
DO - 10.1093/annonc/mdt156
M3 - Article
C2 - 23619032
AN - SCOPUS:84881239116
SN - 0923-7534
VL - 24
SP - 2113
EP - 2118
JO - Annals of Oncology
JF - Annals of Oncology
IS - 8
ER -