Efficacy of tocilizumab in patients hospitalized with covid-19

John H. Stone, Matthew J. Frigault, Naomi J. Serling-Boyd, Ana D. Fernandes, Liam Harvey, Andrea S. Foulkes, Nora K. Horick, Brian C. Healy, Ruta Shah, Ana Maria Bensaci, Ann E. Woolley, Sarah Nikiforow, Nina Lin, Manish Sagar, Harry Schrager, David S. Huckins, Matthew Axelrod, Michael D. Pincus, Jorge Fleisher, Chana A. SacksMichael Dougan, Crystal M. North, Yuan Di Halvorsen, Tara K. Thurber, Zeina Dagher, Allison Scherer, Rachel S. Wallwork, Arthur Y. Kim, Sara Schoenfeld, Pritha Sen, Tomas G. Neilan, Cory A. Perugino, Sebastian H. Unizony, Deborah S. Collier, Mark A. Matza, Janeth M. Yinh, Kathryn A. Bowman, Eric Meyerowitz, Amna Zafar, Zsofia D. Drobni, Marcy B. Bolster, Minna Kohler, Kristin M. D'Silva, Jonathan Dau, Megan M. Lockwood, Caroline Cubbison, Brittany N. Weber, Michael K. Mansour

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

942 Scopus citations


BACKGROUND The efficacy of interleukin-6 receptor blockade in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) who are not receiving mechanical ventilation is unclear. METHODS We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving patients with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, hyperinflammatory states, and at least two of the following signs: fever (body temperature >38°C), pulmonary infiltrates, or the need for supplemental oxygen in order to maintain an oxygen saturation greater than 92%. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive standard care plus a single dose of either tocilizumab (8 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo. The primary outcome was intubation or death, assessed in a time-to-event analysis. The secondary efficacy outcomes were clinical worsening and discontinuation of supplemental oxygen among patients who had been receiving it at baseline, both assessed in time-to-event analyses. RESULTS We enrolled 243 patients; 141 (58%) were men, and 102 (42%) were women. The median age was 59.8 years (range, 21.7 to 85.4), and 45% of the patients were Hispanic or Latino. The hazard ratio for intubation or death in the tocilizumab group as compared with the placebo group was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38 to 1.81; P=0.64), and the hazard ratio for disease worsening was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.59 to 2.10; P=0.73). At 14 days, 18.0% of the patients in the tocilizumab group and 14.9% of the patients in the placebo group had had worsening of disease. The median time to discontinuation of supplemental oxygen was 5.0 days (95% CI, 3.8 to 7.6) in the tocilizumab group and 4.9 days (95% CI, 3.8 to 7.8) in the placebo group (P=0.69). At 14 days, 24.6% of the patients in the tocilizumab group and 21.2% of the patients in the placebo group were still receiving supplemental oxygen. Patients who received tocilizumab had fewer serious infections than patients who received placebo. CONCLUSIONS Tocilizumab was not effective for preventing intubation or death in moderately ill hospitalized patients with Covid-19. Some benefit or harm cannot be ruled out, however, because the confidence intervals for efficacy comparisons were wide.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2333-2344
Number of pages12
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Issue number24
StatePublished - Dec 10 2020
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy of tocilizumab in patients hospitalized with covid-19'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this