TY - JOUR
T1 - Dreams Realized
T2 - A Long-Term Program Evaluation of Three Summer Diversity Pipeline Programs
AU - Stephenson-Hunter, Cara
AU - Strelnick, A. Hal
AU - Rodriguez, Natalia
AU - Stumpf, Luciana A.
AU - Spano, Hope
AU - Gonzalez, Cristina M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Drs. Stephenson-Hunter and Strelnick and Ms. Rodriguez and Ms. Stumpf were supported by HRSA Health Career Opportunity Program awards (D18HP13629 and D18HP29031). Dr. Gonzalez was supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Amos Medical Faculty Development Program 70639, Bureau of Health Professions of the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) of the US Department of Health and Human Services (Grant No. D3 EHP16488-03), NIH/NICHD (Grant No. R25HD068835), and by the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation's Macy Faculty Scholars Program, and NIH/NIMHD (K23MD014178). Dr. Strelnick was supported by NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) Einstein-Montefiore CTSA (UL1 TR002556).
Funding Information:
Drs. Stephenson-Hunter and Strelnick and Ms. Rodriguez and Ms. Stumpf were supported by HRSA Health Career Opportunity Program awards (D18HP13629 and D18HP29031). Dr. Gonzalez was supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s Amos Medical Faculty Development Program 70639, Bureau of Health Professions of the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) of the US Department of Health and Human Services (Grant No. D3 EHP16488-03), NIH/ NICHD (Grant No. R25HD068835), and by the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation’s Macy Faculty Scholars Program, and NIH/NIMHD (K23MD014178). Dr. Strelnick was supported by NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) Einstein-Montefiore CTSA (UL1 TR002556).
Publisher Copyright:
© Cara Stephenson-Hunter et al., 2021; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
PY - 2021/8/1
Y1 - 2021/8/1
N2 - Purpose: Pipeline programs are a well-known approach to enhancing health care workforce diversity and reducing health disparities. Few evaluations of pipeline programs include long-term outcome; fewer still, if any explore perceptions of students after completing such programs, to elucidate factors that contribute to successful entry into the health professions. The authors conducted a program evaluation of three summer diversity pipeline programs in the Bronx, NY, investigating both long-term outcomes and participants' hindsight perspectives of the impact of these programs on their career trajectories. Methods: Investigators conducted a cross-sectional, long-term, mixed-methods survey study. The primary and secondary outcomes for the quantitative analysis were matriculation into biomedical programs to pursue MD or PhD degrees and Master's degrees, respectively, and associated demographic factors. Free-text questions explored the most valuable and influential components of the programs; responses were analyzed qualitatively. Results: Of 147 respondents, 107 (73%) were on-track or had entered a doctoral or master's program, achieving either the primary or secondary outcomes, respectively. Components cited as most valuable included clinical experience, mentorship, career exposure, and research opportunities. Three themes were identified from the free-text responses: (1) Dreams realized; (2) Professional identity formation; and (3) Addressing systemic inequities. Conclusions: These three pipeline programs achieved career outcomes similar to published data. Participants' insights highlight the value of relationships, direct exposure to the health professions, and the importance of such programs to address systemic barriers faced. Results can inform criteria both for participant selection, as well as benchmarks used to define individual and programmatic success.
AB - Purpose: Pipeline programs are a well-known approach to enhancing health care workforce diversity and reducing health disparities. Few evaluations of pipeline programs include long-term outcome; fewer still, if any explore perceptions of students after completing such programs, to elucidate factors that contribute to successful entry into the health professions. The authors conducted a program evaluation of three summer diversity pipeline programs in the Bronx, NY, investigating both long-term outcomes and participants' hindsight perspectives of the impact of these programs on their career trajectories. Methods: Investigators conducted a cross-sectional, long-term, mixed-methods survey study. The primary and secondary outcomes for the quantitative analysis were matriculation into biomedical programs to pursue MD or PhD degrees and Master's degrees, respectively, and associated demographic factors. Free-text questions explored the most valuable and influential components of the programs; responses were analyzed qualitatively. Results: Of 147 respondents, 107 (73%) were on-track or had entered a doctoral or master's program, achieving either the primary or secondary outcomes, respectively. Components cited as most valuable included clinical experience, mentorship, career exposure, and research opportunities. Three themes were identified from the free-text responses: (1) Dreams realized; (2) Professional identity formation; and (3) Addressing systemic inequities. Conclusions: These three pipeline programs achieved career outcomes similar to published data. Participants' insights highlight the value of relationships, direct exposure to the health professions, and the importance of such programs to address systemic barriers faced. Results can inform criteria both for participant selection, as well as benchmarks used to define individual and programmatic success.
KW - URM students
KW - diversity programs
KW - health workforce
KW - pipeline programs
KW - premedical students
KW - social cognitive theory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112177200&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85112177200&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/heq.2020.0126
DO - 10.1089/heq.2020.0126
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85112177200
SN - 2473-1242
VL - 5
SP - 512
EP - 520
JO - Health Equity
JF - Health Equity
IS - 1
ER -