TY - JOUR
T1 - Critical Care Organizations
T2 - Business of Critical Care and Value/Performance Building
AU - Leung, Sharon
AU - Gregg, Sara R.
AU - Coopersmith, Craig M.
AU - Layon, A. Joseph
AU - Oropello, John
AU - Brown, Daniel R.
AU - Pastores, Stephen M.
AU - Kvetan, Vladimir
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Coopersmith’s institution received funding from the National Institutes of Health and the Society of Critical Care Medicine (president-elect in 2014 and president in 2015, where an honorarium for his time was paid to Emory University for this role), and he disclosed grant support for research unrelated to this article. Dr. Oropello received funding from Association of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Program Directors and New York Hospital Queens. Dr. Pastores’ institution received funding from Spectral Medical (grant support as principal investigator for Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center for a septic shock trial) and Bayer Healthcare, and he disclosed other funding from Theravance and Bard Medical for Advisory Board participation, and from New York Hospital Queens and Winthrop University Hospital for medical grand rounds. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest. For information regarding this article, E-mail: sleung@montefiore.org Copyright © 2017 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - Objective: New, value-based regulations and reimbursement structures are creating historic care management challenges, thinning the margins and threatening the viability of hospitals and health systems. The Society of Critical Care Medicine convened a taskforce of Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine on February 22, 2016, during the 45th Critical Care Congress to develop a toolkit drawing on the experience of successful leaders of critical care organizations in North America for advancing critical care organizations (Appendix 1). The goal of this article was to provide a roadmap and call attention to key factors that adult critical care medicine leadership in both academic and nonacademic setting should consider when planning for value-based care. Design: Relevant medical literature was accessed through a literature search. Material published by federal health agencies and other specialty organizations was also reviewed. Collaboratively and iteratively, taskforce members corresponded by electronic mail and held monthly conference calls to finalize this report. Setting: The business and value/performance critical care organization building section comprised of leaders of critical care organizations with expertise in critical care administration, healthcare management, and clinical practice. Measurements and Main Results: Two phases of critical care organizations care integration are described: "horizontal," within the system and regionalization of care as an initial phase, and "vertical," with a post-ICU and postacute care continuum as a succeeding phase. The tools required for the clinical and financial transformation are provided, including the essential prerequisites of forming a critical care organization; the manner in which a critical care organization can help manage transformational domains is considered. Lastly, how to achieve organizational health system support for critical care organization implementation is discussed. Conclusions: A critical care organization that incorporates functional clinical horizontal and vertical integration for ICU patients and survivors, aligns strategy and operations with those of the parent health system, and encompasses knowledge on finance and risk will be better positioned to succeed in the value-based world.
AB - Objective: New, value-based regulations and reimbursement structures are creating historic care management challenges, thinning the margins and threatening the viability of hospitals and health systems. The Society of Critical Care Medicine convened a taskforce of Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine on February 22, 2016, during the 45th Critical Care Congress to develop a toolkit drawing on the experience of successful leaders of critical care organizations in North America for advancing critical care organizations (Appendix 1). The goal of this article was to provide a roadmap and call attention to key factors that adult critical care medicine leadership in both academic and nonacademic setting should consider when planning for value-based care. Design: Relevant medical literature was accessed through a literature search. Material published by federal health agencies and other specialty organizations was also reviewed. Collaboratively and iteratively, taskforce members corresponded by electronic mail and held monthly conference calls to finalize this report. Setting: The business and value/performance critical care organization building section comprised of leaders of critical care organizations with expertise in critical care administration, healthcare management, and clinical practice. Measurements and Main Results: Two phases of critical care organizations care integration are described: "horizontal," within the system and regionalization of care as an initial phase, and "vertical," with a post-ICU and postacute care continuum as a succeeding phase. The tools required for the clinical and financial transformation are provided, including the essential prerequisites of forming a critical care organization; the manner in which a critical care organization can help manage transformational domains is considered. Lastly, how to achieve organizational health system support for critical care organization implementation is discussed. Conclusions: A critical care organization that incorporates functional clinical horizontal and vertical integration for ICU patients and survivors, aligns strategy and operations with those of the parent health system, and encompasses knowledge on finance and risk will be better positioned to succeed in the value-based world.
KW - critical care
KW - critical care organization
KW - horizontal integration
KW - value-based care
KW - vertical integration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038254449&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038254449&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002696
DO - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002696
M3 - Article
C2 - 28863012
AN - SCOPUS:85038254449
SN - 0090-3493
VL - 46
SP - 1
EP - 11
JO - Critical care medicine
JF - Critical care medicine
IS - 1
ER -