TY - JOUR
T1 - Criminal-thinking styles and illegal behavior among college students
T2 - Validation of the PICTS
AU - McCoy, Katrina
AU - Fremouw, William
AU - Tyner, Elizabeth
AU - Clegg, Carl
AU - Johansson-Love, Jill
AU - Strunk, Julia
PY - 2006/9/1
Y1 - 2006/9/1
N2 - The present study examined the relation of self-reported criminal-thinking styles and self-reported illegal behavior among college students. Participants were 177 male and 216 female (N=393) undergraduate students. Participants were divided by gender and further classified into four groups of self-reported illegal behavior: control-status offenses, drug crimes, property crimes, and violent crimes against people. The psychological inventory of criminal-thinking styles (PICTS) (1) measured criminal-thinking patterns on eight scales. Results indicated that males who committed violent crimes against people endorsed significantly higher levels of distorted criminal-thinking patterns on all scales than the control-status offenses, and drug crimes groups. Interestingly, female participants who committed property crimes displayed six significantly elevated PICTS scales whereas females with violent crimes against people had significant elevations on only four of the criminal-thinking style scales. These results extend Walter's initial validation of the PICTS with incarcerated respondents to a nonincarcerated population and show potential use of the PICTS with other populations.
AB - The present study examined the relation of self-reported criminal-thinking styles and self-reported illegal behavior among college students. Participants were 177 male and 216 female (N=393) undergraduate students. Participants were divided by gender and further classified into four groups of self-reported illegal behavior: control-status offenses, drug crimes, property crimes, and violent crimes against people. The psychological inventory of criminal-thinking styles (PICTS) (1) measured criminal-thinking patterns on eight scales. Results indicated that males who committed violent crimes against people endorsed significantly higher levels of distorted criminal-thinking patterns on all scales than the control-status offenses, and drug crimes groups. Interestingly, female participants who committed property crimes displayed six significantly elevated PICTS scales whereas females with violent crimes against people had significant elevations on only four of the criminal-thinking style scales. These results extend Walter's initial validation of the PICTS with incarcerated respondents to a nonincarcerated population and show potential use of the PICTS with other populations.
KW - Criminal-thinking styles
KW - Forensic science
KW - Illegal behavior
KW - Psychological inventory of criminal-thinking styles
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749030476&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749030476&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00216.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00216.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 17018105
AN - SCOPUS:33749030476
SN - 0022-1198
VL - 51
SP - 1174
EP - 1177
JO - Journal of Forensic Sciences
JF - Journal of Forensic Sciences
IS - 5
ER -