TY - JOUR
T1 - Cell-free DNA screening for prenatal detection of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome
AU - Dar, Pe'er
AU - Jacobsson, Bo
AU - Clifton, Rebecca
AU - Egbert, Melissa
AU - Malone, Fergal
AU - Wapner, Ronald J.
AU - Roman, Ashley S.
AU - Khalil, Asma
AU - Faro, Revital
AU - Madankumar, Rajeevi
AU - Edwards, Lance
AU - Strong, Noel
AU - Haeri, Sina
AU - Silver, Robert
AU - Vohra, Nidhi
AU - Hyett, Jon
AU - Demko, Zachary
AU - Martin, Kimberly
AU - Rabinowitz, Matthew
AU - Flood, Karen
AU - Carlsson, Ylva
AU - Doulaveris, Georgios
AU - Daly, Sean
AU - Hallingström, Maria
AU - MacPherson, Cora
AU - Kao, Charlly
AU - Hakonarson, Hakon
AU - Norton, Mary E.
N1 - Funding Information:
All site principal investigators (P.D., B.J., F.M., R.J.W., A.R., A.K., R.F., R.M., L.E., S.H., R.S., N.V., J.H., C.M., R.C., and M.E.N.) received institutional research support from the funding sponsor (Natera). M.E., Z.D., and M.R. report being employed by the study’s funding sponsor (Natera) and holding stock or having options to hold stock. K.M. is a consultant for the funding sponsor (Natera) and holds stock and options to hold stock. J.H. reports ongoing research collaboration that includes financial support for biochemical analytes from Perkin Elmer, earning honoraria and/or giving talks that were not compensated for by Natera, Roche, or Canon, and previously participating in Asian and Australasian expert consultancies for Natera and Roche. B.J. reports participating in clinical research diagnostic trials with Ariosa (completed), Vanadis (completed), Natera (ongoing), and Hologic (completed) with expenditures for each patient being reimbursed by the institution and with no personal reimbursements; participating in clinical probiotic studies with products provided by FukoPharma (ongoing, no funding) and BioGaia (ongoing; also provided a research grant for the specific study); coordinating scientific conferences and meetings with commercial partners such as the European Spontaneous Preterm Birth Congress 2016 and a Nordic educational meeting about noninvasive prenatal testing and preeclampsia screening. B.J. and Y.C. report collaborating with the IMPACT study, which received reagents for placental growth factor analyses from Roche, Perkin Elmer, and ThermoFisher Scientific. R.J.W. reports receiving research funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and receiving support from Illumina for research reagents. M.E.N. reports serving as a consultant for Invitae. All other authors report no conflict of interest.
Funding Information:
All site principal investigators (P.D., B.J., F.M., R.J.W., A.R., A.K., R.F., R.M., L.E., S.H., R.S., N.V., J.H., C.M., R.C., and M.E.N.) received institutional research support from the funding sponsor (Natera). M.E., Z.D., and M.R. report being employed by the study's funding sponsor (Natera) and holding stock or having options to hold stock. K.M. is a consultant for the funding sponsor (Natera) and holds stock and options to hold stock. J.H. reports ongoing research collaboration that includes financial support for biochemical analytes from Perkin Elmer, earning honoraria and/or giving talks that were not compensated for by Natera, Roche, or Canon, and previously participating in Asian and Australasian expert consultancies for Natera and Roche. B.J. reports participating in clinical research diagnostic trials with Ariosa (completed), Vanadis (completed), Natera (ongoing), and Hologic (completed) with expenditures for each patient being reimbursed by the institution and with no personal reimbursements; participating in clinical probiotic studies with products provided by FukoPharma (ongoing, no funding) and BioGaia (ongoing; also provided a research grant for the specific study); coordinating scientific conferences and meetings with commercial partners such as the European Spontaneous Preterm Birth Congress 2016 and a Nordic educational meeting about noninvasive prenatal testing and preeclampsia screening. B.J. and Y.C. report collaborating with the IMPACT study, which received reagents for placental growth factor analyses from Roche, Perkin Elmer, and ThermoFisher Scientific. R.J.W. reports receiving research funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and receiving support from Illumina for research reagents. M.E.N. reports serving as a consultant for Invitae. All other authors report no conflict of interest. This study was funded by Natera, Inc, San Carlos, CA. This study was a collaboration between the clinical investigators and the funding sponsor. P.D., M.E.N., and R.C. designed the protocol with the sponsor (M.E., Z.D., K.M., and M.R.). There were no confidentiality agreements between the authors, sites, or sponsor.Data sharing requests should be submitted to the corresponding author (P.D.) for consideration. Requests will be considered by the study publication committee. Study protocol and statistical analysis plan will be available on request. Individual patient data will not be available. Access to de-identified data may be granted following submission of a written proposal and a signed data sharing agreement. Files will be shared using a secure File Transfer Protocol.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s)
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Background: Historically, prenatal screening has focused primarily on the detection of fetal aneuploidies. Cell-free DNA now enables noninvasive screening for subchromosomal copy number variants, including 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (or DiGeorge syndrome), which is the most common microdeletion and a leading cause of congenital heart defects and neurodevelopmental delay. Although smaller studies have demonstrated the feasibility of screening for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, large cohort studies with confirmatory postnatal testing to assess test performance have not been reported. Objective: This study aimed to assess the performance of single-nucleotide polymorphism–based, prenatal cell-free DNA screening for detection of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Study Design: Patients who underwent single-nucleotide polymorphism–based prenatal cell-free DNA screening for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome were prospectively enrolled at 21 centers in 6 countries. Prenatal or newborn DNA samples were requested in all cases for genetic confirmation using chromosomal microarrays. The primary outcome was sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of cell-free DNA screening for the detection of all deletions, including the classical deletion and nested deletions that are ≥500 kb, in the 22q11.2 low-copy repeat A-D region. Secondary outcomes included the prevalence of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and performance of an updated cell-free DNA algorithm that was evaluated with blinding to the pregnancy outcome. Results: Of the 20,887 women enrolled, a genetic outcome was available for 18,289 (87.6%). A total of 12 22q11.2 deletion syndrome cases were confirmed in the cohort, including 5 (41.7%) nested deletions, yielding a prevalence of 1 in 1524. In the total cohort, cell-free DNA screening identified 17,976 (98.3%) cases as low risk for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and 38 (0.2%) cases as high risk; 275 (1.5%) cases were nonreportable. Overall, 9 of 12 cases of 22q11.2 were detected, yielding a sensitivity of 75.0% (95% confidence interval, 42.8–94.5); specificity of 99.84% (95% confidence interval, 99.77–99.89); positive predictive value of 23.7% (95% confidence interval, 11.44–40.24), and negative predictive value of 99.98% (95% confidence interval, 99.95–100). None of the cases with a nonreportable result was diagnosed with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. The updated algorithm detected 10 of 12 cases (83.3%; 95% confidence interval, 51.6–97.9) with a lower false positive rate (0.05% vs 0.16%; P<.001) and a positive predictive value of 52.6% (10/19; 95% confidence interval, 28.9–75.6). Conclusion: Noninvasive cell-free DNA prenatal screening for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome can detect most affected cases, including smaller nested deletions, with a low false positive rate.
AB - Background: Historically, prenatal screening has focused primarily on the detection of fetal aneuploidies. Cell-free DNA now enables noninvasive screening for subchromosomal copy number variants, including 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (or DiGeorge syndrome), which is the most common microdeletion and a leading cause of congenital heart defects and neurodevelopmental delay. Although smaller studies have demonstrated the feasibility of screening for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, large cohort studies with confirmatory postnatal testing to assess test performance have not been reported. Objective: This study aimed to assess the performance of single-nucleotide polymorphism–based, prenatal cell-free DNA screening for detection of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Study Design: Patients who underwent single-nucleotide polymorphism–based prenatal cell-free DNA screening for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome were prospectively enrolled at 21 centers in 6 countries. Prenatal or newborn DNA samples were requested in all cases for genetic confirmation using chromosomal microarrays. The primary outcome was sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of cell-free DNA screening for the detection of all deletions, including the classical deletion and nested deletions that are ≥500 kb, in the 22q11.2 low-copy repeat A-D region. Secondary outcomes included the prevalence of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and performance of an updated cell-free DNA algorithm that was evaluated with blinding to the pregnancy outcome. Results: Of the 20,887 women enrolled, a genetic outcome was available for 18,289 (87.6%). A total of 12 22q11.2 deletion syndrome cases were confirmed in the cohort, including 5 (41.7%) nested deletions, yielding a prevalence of 1 in 1524. In the total cohort, cell-free DNA screening identified 17,976 (98.3%) cases as low risk for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and 38 (0.2%) cases as high risk; 275 (1.5%) cases were nonreportable. Overall, 9 of 12 cases of 22q11.2 were detected, yielding a sensitivity of 75.0% (95% confidence interval, 42.8–94.5); specificity of 99.84% (95% confidence interval, 99.77–99.89); positive predictive value of 23.7% (95% confidence interval, 11.44–40.24), and negative predictive value of 99.98% (95% confidence interval, 99.95–100). None of the cases with a nonreportable result was diagnosed with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. The updated algorithm detected 10 of 12 cases (83.3%; 95% confidence interval, 51.6–97.9) with a lower false positive rate (0.05% vs 0.16%; P<.001) and a positive predictive value of 52.6% (10/19; 95% confidence interval, 28.9–75.6). Conclusion: Noninvasive cell-free DNA prenatal screening for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome can detect most affected cases, including smaller nested deletions, with a low false positive rate.
KW - 22q11.2 deletion syndrome
KW - DiGeorge syndrome
KW - cell-free DNA (cfDNA)
KW - prenatal screening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124563548&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124563548&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.01.002
DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.01.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 35033576
AN - SCOPUS:85124563548
SN - 0002-9378
VL - 227
SP - 79.e1-79.e11
JO - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
JF - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
IS - 1
ER -