TY - JOUR
T1 - A pivotal response treatment package for children with autism spectrum disorder
T2 - An RCT
AU - Gengoux, Grace W.
AU - Abrams, Daniel A.
AU - Schuck, Rachel
AU - Millan, Maria Estefania
AU - Libove, Robin
AU - Ardel, Christina M.
AU - Phillips, Jennifer M.
AU - Fox, Melanie
AU - Frazier, Thomas W.
AU - Hardan, Antonio Y.
N1 - Funding Information:
FUNDING: Supported by a grant from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC01368902; principal investigator: Dr Hardan). Dr Abrams received additional support from a National Institute of Mental Health K01 Mentored Research Scientist Development Award (MH102428). Data management was supported by the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health through grant UL1 TR001085. Funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Funding Information:
Supported by a grant from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC01368902; principal investigator: Dr Hardan). Dr Abrams received additional support from a National Institute of Mental Health K01 Mentored Research Scientist Development Award (MH102428). Data management was supported by the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health through grant UL1 TR001085. Funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate a pivotal response treatment package (PRT-P) consisting of parent training and clinician-delivered in-home intervention on the communication skills of children with autism spectrum disorder. METHODS: Forty-eight children with autism spectrum disorder and significant language delay between 2 and 5 years old were randomly assigned to PRT-P (n = 24) or the delayed treatment group (n = 24) for 24 weeks. The effect of treatment on child communication skills was assessed via behavioral coding of parent-child interactions, standardized parent-report measures, and blinded clinician ratings. RESULTS: Analysis of child utterances during the structured laboratory observation revealed that, compared with the delayed treatment group, children in PRT-P demonstrated greater improvement in frequency of functional utterances (F1,41 = 6.07; P = .026; d = 0.61). The majority of parents in the PRT-P group (91%) were able to implement pivotal response treatment (PRT) with fidelity within 24 weeks. Children receiving PRT-P also demonstrated greater improvement on the Brief Observation of Social Communication Change, on the Clinical Global Impressions Improvement subscale, and in number of words used on a parent-report questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first 24-week randomized controlled trial in which community treatment is compared with the combination of parent training and clinician-delivered PRT. PRT-P was effective for improving child social communication skills and for teaching parents to implement PRT. Additional research will be needed to understand the optimal combination of treatment settings, intensity, and duration, and to identify child and parent characteristics associated with treatment response.
AB - OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate a pivotal response treatment package (PRT-P) consisting of parent training and clinician-delivered in-home intervention on the communication skills of children with autism spectrum disorder. METHODS: Forty-eight children with autism spectrum disorder and significant language delay between 2 and 5 years old were randomly assigned to PRT-P (n = 24) or the delayed treatment group (n = 24) for 24 weeks. The effect of treatment on child communication skills was assessed via behavioral coding of parent-child interactions, standardized parent-report measures, and blinded clinician ratings. RESULTS: Analysis of child utterances during the structured laboratory observation revealed that, compared with the delayed treatment group, children in PRT-P demonstrated greater improvement in frequency of functional utterances (F1,41 = 6.07; P = .026; d = 0.61). The majority of parents in the PRT-P group (91%) were able to implement pivotal response treatment (PRT) with fidelity within 24 weeks. Children receiving PRT-P also demonstrated greater improvement on the Brief Observation of Social Communication Change, on the Clinical Global Impressions Improvement subscale, and in number of words used on a parent-report questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first 24-week randomized controlled trial in which community treatment is compared with the combination of parent training and clinician-delivered PRT. PRT-P was effective for improving child social communication skills and for teaching parents to implement PRT. Additional research will be needed to understand the optimal combination of treatment settings, intensity, and duration, and to identify child and parent characteristics associated with treatment response.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071782282&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071782282&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1542/peds.2019-0178
DO - 10.1542/peds.2019-0178
M3 - Article
C2 - 31387868
AN - SCOPUS:85071782282
SN - 0031-4005
VL - 144
JO - Pediatrics
JF - Pediatrics
IS - 3
M1 - 20190178
ER -