TY - JOUR
T1 - A Comparison of Temperature Thresholds to Begin Laboratory Evaluation of Well-Appearing Febrile Infants
AU - Lam, Sophia
AU - Chamdawala, Haamid
AU - Friedman, Jonathan
AU - Meltzer, James A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This article was prepared using the “Application of Transcriptional Signatures for Diagnosis of Febrile Infants Within the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN)” (STUDY) Data Set obtained from UTAH, and does not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of the STUDY investigators or the Health Resources Services Administration (HRSA) Maternal Child Health Bureau (MCHB) Emergency Medical Services for Children (EMSC). The PECARN was funded by the HRSA/MCHB/EMSC.
Publisher Copyright:
© Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/11/1
Y1 - 2022/11/1
N2 - Objective Young infants who develop fever are at an increased risk for serious infection. It is unclear, however, what temperature cutoff would be optimal to begin evaluating these infants because some criteria use different thresholds. We sought to determine the percentage of infants presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with a temperature less than 38.2°C who develop serious infection compared with those with higher temperatures. Methods We used a publicly available dataset from the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network. Patients were included if they were aged 60 days or younger, had a documented rectal temperature of 38.0°C or higher in the ED or a history of fever within 24 hours before presentation to the ED, and were being evaluated for serious infection. We used the same exclusion criteria as the original Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network study but further excluded those who were ill-Appearing (Yale Observation Score > 10). Serious infections included any of the following: urinary tract infection, bacteremia, bacterial or herpes meningitis, bacterial pneumonia, or bacterial enteritis. Data were described using frequencies (percentages) and compared between groups using χ2 test. Results Of the 4619 eligible infants, 1311 (28.4%) had a temperature lower than 38.2°C. Infants with temperatures lower than 38.2°C were significantly less likely to have a serious infection compared with those with higher temperatures (97 [7.5%] vs 365 [11.2%], P < 0.001). Of the infants with temperatures lower than 38.2°C who were tested, 67 (5.8%) had a urinary tract infection, 10 (0.8%) had bacteremia, 3 (0.4%) had bacterial meningitis, 3 (2.9%) had herpes meningitis, 17 (4.5%) had bacterial pneumonia, and 2 (4.8%) had bacterial enteritis. Conclusions In this study, we found that infants with temperatures lower than 38.2°C were significantly less likely to have a serious infection than those with higher temperatures. Using an evaluation cutoff of 38.2°C, however, would likely miss a clinically important number of well-Appearing infants with serious infections.
AB - Objective Young infants who develop fever are at an increased risk for serious infection. It is unclear, however, what temperature cutoff would be optimal to begin evaluating these infants because some criteria use different thresholds. We sought to determine the percentage of infants presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with a temperature less than 38.2°C who develop serious infection compared with those with higher temperatures. Methods We used a publicly available dataset from the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network. Patients were included if they were aged 60 days or younger, had a documented rectal temperature of 38.0°C or higher in the ED or a history of fever within 24 hours before presentation to the ED, and were being evaluated for serious infection. We used the same exclusion criteria as the original Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network study but further excluded those who were ill-Appearing (Yale Observation Score > 10). Serious infections included any of the following: urinary tract infection, bacteremia, bacterial or herpes meningitis, bacterial pneumonia, or bacterial enteritis. Data were described using frequencies (percentages) and compared between groups using χ2 test. Results Of the 4619 eligible infants, 1311 (28.4%) had a temperature lower than 38.2°C. Infants with temperatures lower than 38.2°C were significantly less likely to have a serious infection compared with those with higher temperatures (97 [7.5%] vs 365 [11.2%], P < 0.001). Of the infants with temperatures lower than 38.2°C who were tested, 67 (5.8%) had a urinary tract infection, 10 (0.8%) had bacteremia, 3 (0.4%) had bacterial meningitis, 3 (2.9%) had herpes meningitis, 17 (4.5%) had bacterial pneumonia, and 2 (4.8%) had bacterial enteritis. Conclusions In this study, we found that infants with temperatures lower than 38.2°C were significantly less likely to have a serious infection than those with higher temperatures. Using an evaluation cutoff of 38.2°C, however, would likely miss a clinically important number of well-Appearing infants with serious infections.
KW - febrile infant
KW - fever workup
KW - serious infection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141005410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85141005410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002821
DO - 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002821
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35981325
AN - SCOPUS:85141005410
SN - 0749-5161
VL - 38
SP - 628
EP - 632
JO - Pediatric Emergency Care
JF - Pediatric Emergency Care
IS - 11
ER -