DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Gliosis is a response to brain damage and is a prominent feature of many neurological disorders including epilepsy, neurodegeneration, tumor growth, stroke, and trauma. The response to damage involves cell types from within the CNS and can include infiltrating immune cells. The extent of the response varies and is modulated by a number of secreted factors (Sofroniew, 2009;Kang and Hibert, 2011). For some of these factors, however, their requirement and role in gliosis has not been clearly defined or demonstrated in vivo. This is particularly true for Fibroblast Growth Factors (FGFs). Previous immunohistochemical analyses suggested that nuclear FGF2 and at least one receptor are up-regulated in astrocytes in response to damage (Eddleston and Mucke, 1993;Ridet et al., 1997). However, the significance of these immunostains is unknown. Moreover the role of FGF signaling in mature astrocytes in vivo under normal conditions as well as after injury remains unaddressed. The goal of this proposal is to provide definitive evidence for the role of FGFs in astrogliosis under normal conditions and in response to damage. To address the function of FGF signaling in the adult cerebrum, we conditionally deleted floxed alleles of Fgfr1 and Fgfr2 in an Fgfr3 null background. We used a NestinCreER mouse line in which CreER, upon tamoxifen treatment, is unexpectedly active specifically in astrocytes throughout the hippocampal and cortical parenchyma (in addition to the expected neurogenic regions). Our preliminary data indicate that in FGF receptor triple mutants there is a tremendous increase in astrocytic GFAP, Vimentin, and Nestin expression, indicative of astrogliosis. This increase in intermediate filaments is not observed in tamoxifen-treated heterozygous littermate controls that carry NestinCreER or in mutants that lack only one or two receptors. The absence of the phenotype in single and double mutants suggests functional compensation between receptors and may explain why this phenotype has not previously been reported. The increase in gliotic markers in the triple mutant is not accompanied by detectable signs of tissue damage, cell death, or obvious changes in the neurogenic regions. Moreover, our preliminary data suggests that the astrocytes that are reactive in the mutants are the ones that have lost FGF signaling whereas neighboring non-reactive ones have maintained signaling. This leads us to the hypothesis that FGF receptors act cell autonomously in the absence of injury to suppress astrogliosis. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: In the brain, astrocytes are a cell type that responds to damage. Despite the importance of the response to damage, the molecular mechanisms that control it remain poorly understood. The degree of the response depends on the type and severity of the damage. For example, in some cases astrocytes form scar tissue and it some cases they do not. Although scar formation is essential to minimizing the spread of damage, it is also refractory to regeneration. Therefore the degree of the response to damage is believed to be tightly regulated by secreted factors, intracellular signaling factors, and structural proteins (intermediate filaments). One family of factors that has been postulated to promote the astrocyte response, despite the lack of definitive evidence, are FGFs. In this proposal, however, we aim to provide the first definitive evidence to the contrary: that FGFs in fact inhibit the astrocyte response. This is significant because there are few if any other clear examples of factors that maintain the response in check in the unperturbed brain and after injury. Our preliminary data suggest that FGF signaling is required in adults to actively suppress the astrocyte response, even in the absence of injury. Hence this provides a potential means of modulating the extent or duration of the response for therapeutic purposes.
|Effective start/end date
|9/1/11 → 5/31/13
- Clinical Neurology
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
Explore the research topics touched on by this project. These labels are generated based on the underlying awards/grants. Together they form a unique fingerprint.