TY - JOUR
T1 - Weight loss one year after laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass is not dependent on the type of gastrojejunal anastomosis
AU - Munoz-Flores, Fernando
AU - Rodriguez-Quintero, Jorge Humberto
AU - Pechman, David
AU - Creange, Collin
AU - Zenilman, Ariela
AU - Choi, Jenny
AU - Moran-Atkin, Erin
AU - Lima, Diego L.
AU - Camacho, Diego
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Background: Laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is the gold standard weight-loss procedure. There are different techniques to perform the gastrojejunal (GJ) anastomosis, but there is no consensus as to which one is superior for weight loss. Our goal in this study was to assess one-year weight loss after LRYGB comparing the three different techniques at our tertiary care center. Methods: The American college of surgeons (ACS) Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP®) data for Montefiore Medical Center for years 2014–2017 were analyzed. Three surgeons were included in this study; each type of anastomosis was performed by a single surgeon. Patients were included if they underwent primary LRYGB. Patients were designated to one of three different groups depending of the type of gastrojejunal anastomosis performed: hand sewn, circular stapled, or linear stapled. One-year weight loss was assessed as primary endpoint of the study. A descriptive analysis of perioperative variables for each group was included as well. Results: A total of 1011 patients underwent primary LRYGB. 429 (42.1%) were performed with circular-stapled GJ anastomosis, 433 (42.5%) with a hand-sewn GJ anastomosis, and 149 (14.6%) linear-stapled GJ anastomosis. The median BMI was 46.08 ± 6.43, with no difference between groups (p =.405). Procedure time was 106.70 ± 28.23 min for the circular group, 108.27 ± 28.59 min for the hand-sewn group, and 115.78 ± 36.11 min for the linear group (p > 0.005). There were no significant differences in complications except for the need of postoperative transfusions (p < 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference in %EWL one year after surgery: %EWL was 58.81 ± 16.54 kg for hand sewn, 58.86 ± 14.84 kg for circular, and 59.20 ± 17.58Kg for linear. (p =.595). Conclusion: There is no difference in weight loss one year after LRYGB based on the type of gastrojejunal anastomosis performed.
AB - Background: Laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is the gold standard weight-loss procedure. There are different techniques to perform the gastrojejunal (GJ) anastomosis, but there is no consensus as to which one is superior for weight loss. Our goal in this study was to assess one-year weight loss after LRYGB comparing the three different techniques at our tertiary care center. Methods: The American college of surgeons (ACS) Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP®) data for Montefiore Medical Center for years 2014–2017 were analyzed. Three surgeons were included in this study; each type of anastomosis was performed by a single surgeon. Patients were included if they underwent primary LRYGB. Patients were designated to one of three different groups depending of the type of gastrojejunal anastomosis performed: hand sewn, circular stapled, or linear stapled. One-year weight loss was assessed as primary endpoint of the study. A descriptive analysis of perioperative variables for each group was included as well. Results: A total of 1011 patients underwent primary LRYGB. 429 (42.1%) were performed with circular-stapled GJ anastomosis, 433 (42.5%) with a hand-sewn GJ anastomosis, and 149 (14.6%) linear-stapled GJ anastomosis. The median BMI was 46.08 ± 6.43, with no difference between groups (p =.405). Procedure time was 106.70 ± 28.23 min for the circular group, 108.27 ± 28.59 min for the hand-sewn group, and 115.78 ± 36.11 min for the linear group (p > 0.005). There were no significant differences in complications except for the need of postoperative transfusions (p < 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference in %EWL one year after surgery: %EWL was 58.81 ± 16.54 kg for hand sewn, 58.86 ± 14.84 kg for circular, and 59.20 ± 17.58Kg for linear. (p =.595). Conclusion: There is no difference in weight loss one year after LRYGB based on the type of gastrojejunal anastomosis performed.
KW - Circular-stapled anastomosis
KW - Gastrojejunostomy
KW - Hand-sewn anastomosis
KW - Laparoscopic roux-en Y gastric bypass
KW - Linear-stapled anastomosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100118091&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100118091&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00464-021-08288-2
DO - 10.1007/s00464-021-08288-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 33523274
AN - SCOPUS:85100118091
SN - 0930-2794
VL - 36
SP - 787
EP - 792
JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
IS - 1
ER -