TY - JOUR
T1 - The association of postoperative pulmonary complications in 109,360 patients with pressure-controlled or volume-controlled ventilation
AU - Bagchi, A.
AU - Rudolph, M. I.
AU - Ng, P. Y.
AU - Timm, F. P.
AU - Long, D. R.
AU - Shaefi, S.
AU - Ladha, K.
AU - Vidal Melo, M. F.
AU - Eikermann, M.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Chloe Gianatasio and Stephanie D. Grabitz for their help with data and statistical analysis. Matthias Eikermann has received grants from Jeffrey and Judy Buzen and Merck & Co., Inc. to conduct research. Marcos F. Vidal Melo received a grant from the National Institute of Health. Aranya Bagchi received a Discovery Award from the United States Department of Defence Peer-Reviewed Medical Research Program and he is a consultant for Lungpacer Medical, Inc. No other external funding or competing interests declared.
Funding Information:
We thank Chloe Gianatasio and Stephanie D. Grabitz for their help with data and statistical analysis. Matthias Eikermann has received grants from Jeffrey and Judy Buzen and Merck & Co., Inc. to conduct research. Marcos F. Vidal Melo received a grant from the National Institute of Health. Aranya Bagchi received a Discovery Award from the United States Department of Defence Peer-Reviewed Medical Research Program and he is a consultant for Lung-pacer Medical, Inc. No other external funding or competing interests declared.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland
PY - 2017/11
Y1 - 2017/11
N2 - We thought that the rate of postoperative pulmonary complications might be higher after pressure-controlled ventilation than after volume-controlled ventilation. We analysed peri-operative data recorded for 109,360 adults, whose lungs were mechanically ventilated during surgery at three hospitals in Massachusetts, USA. We used multivariable regression and propensity score matching. Postoperative pulmonary complications were more common after pressure-controlled ventilation, odds ratio (95%CI) 1.29 (1.21–1.37), p < 0.001. Tidal volumes and driving pressures were more varied with pressure-controlled ventilation compared with volume-controlled ventilation: mean (SD) variance from the median 1.61 (1.36) ml.kg −1 vs. 1.23 (1.11) ml.kg −1 , p < 0.001; and 3.91 (3.47) cmH 2 O vs. 3.40 (2.69) cmH 2 O, p < 0.001. The odds ratio (95%CI) of pulmonary complications after pressure-controlled ventilation compared with volume-controlled ventilation at positive end-expiratory pressures < 5 cmH 2 O was 1.40 (1.26–1.55) and 1.20 (1.11–1.31) when ≥ 5 cmH 2 O, both p < 0.001, a relative risk ratio of 1.17 (1.03–1.33), p = 0.023. The odds ratio (95%CI) of pulmonary complications after pressure-controlled ventilation compared with volume-controlled ventilation at driving pressures of < 19 cmH 2 O was 1.37 (1.27–1.48), p < 0.001, and 1.16 (1.04–1.30) when ≥ 19 cmH 2 O, p = 0.011, a relative risk ratio of 1.18 (1.07–1.30), p = 0.016. Our data support volume-controlled ventilation during surgery, particularly for patients more likely to suffer postoperative pulmonary complications.
AB - We thought that the rate of postoperative pulmonary complications might be higher after pressure-controlled ventilation than after volume-controlled ventilation. We analysed peri-operative data recorded for 109,360 adults, whose lungs were mechanically ventilated during surgery at three hospitals in Massachusetts, USA. We used multivariable regression and propensity score matching. Postoperative pulmonary complications were more common after pressure-controlled ventilation, odds ratio (95%CI) 1.29 (1.21–1.37), p < 0.001. Tidal volumes and driving pressures were more varied with pressure-controlled ventilation compared with volume-controlled ventilation: mean (SD) variance from the median 1.61 (1.36) ml.kg −1 vs. 1.23 (1.11) ml.kg −1 , p < 0.001; and 3.91 (3.47) cmH 2 O vs. 3.40 (2.69) cmH 2 O, p < 0.001. The odds ratio (95%CI) of pulmonary complications after pressure-controlled ventilation compared with volume-controlled ventilation at positive end-expiratory pressures < 5 cmH 2 O was 1.40 (1.26–1.55) and 1.20 (1.11–1.31) when ≥ 5 cmH 2 O, both p < 0.001, a relative risk ratio of 1.17 (1.03–1.33), p = 0.023. The odds ratio (95%CI) of pulmonary complications after pressure-controlled ventilation compared with volume-controlled ventilation at driving pressures of < 19 cmH 2 O was 1.37 (1.27–1.48), p < 0.001, and 1.16 (1.04–1.30) when ≥ 19 cmH 2 O, p = 0.011, a relative risk ratio of 1.18 (1.07–1.30), p = 0.016. Our data support volume-controlled ventilation during surgery, particularly for patients more likely to suffer postoperative pulmonary complications.
KW - lung protection ventilation: pressure goal
KW - pressure-controlled ventilation
KW - volume-controlled ventilation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029234651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029234651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/anae.14039
DO - 10.1111/anae.14039
M3 - Article
C2 - 28891046
AN - SCOPUS:85029234651
SN - 0003-2409
VL - 72
SP - 1334
EP - 1343
JO - Anaesthesia
JF - Anaesthesia
IS - 11
ER -