Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

TAPP vs. TEP vs. rTAPP: What Does the Evidence Show?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery for repair of inguinal hernias with mesh has been used for over 25 years, since it was first described in 1991 by Shultz. The aim of this chapter is to look at the current data and evidence available comparing the TEP and TAPP techniques for inguinal hernia repair with mesh, as well as a comparison of the laparoscopic repairs to the rTAPP. While there are several studies, including randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses, comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs, there is less data directly comparing the two laparoscopic techniques. There are even fewer studies comparing laparoscopy to the newer rTAPP. In addition to landmark papers, the most current published data will be discussed in this chapter to see what evidence is available to help choose the right minimally invasive technique for both the surgeon and patient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe SAGES Manual of Hernia Surgery
PublisherSpringer Science+Business Media
Pages439-447
Number of pages9
ISBN (Electronic)9783319784113
ISBN (Print)9783319784106
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Keywords

  • Inguinal hernias
  • Laparoscopic surgery
  • Mesh
  • rTAPP
  • TAPP
  • TEP

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'TAPP vs. TEP vs. rTAPP: What Does the Evidence Show?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this