Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Spinal Cord Stimulation Explantation and Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Technology Recommendations

  • Sayed E. Wahezi
  • , Ugur Yener
  • , Tahereh Naeimi
  • , Joshua B. Lewis
  • , Sandeep Yerra
  • , Philip Sgobba
  • , Hatice Begum Ciftci
  • , Amaresh Vydyanathan
  • , Elisa Chiu
  • , Denis Cherkalin
  • , Jay Y. Darji
  • , Ryan Masterson
  • , Danielle Lee
  • , Atthakorn Jarusriwanna
  • , Suwannika Palee
  • , Nicole R. Ortiz
  • , Moorice Caparo
  • , Eli Dayon
  • , Camille Fontaine
  • , Marom Bikson
  • Michael E. Schatman, Scott G. Pritzlaff, Timothy R. Deer, Corey W. Hunter

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Chronic pain affects 20.5% of the US population, costing $296 billion annually in lost productivity. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has become a key treatment for refractory neuropathic and nociceptive pain, with increasing usage due to technological advancements. However, the durability of SCS therapy, including explantation rates, remains a concern. Understanding explantation causes is essential for improving patient selection and device effectiveness. This study aims to analyze SCS explantation rates and reasons, as well as evaluate the financial burden of these procedures on the healthcare system. Methods: Three primary screening methods were used: manual search with keywords, MeSH term query, and reference list screening. The search covered PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases from inception to November 2024, yielding 719 articles. After applying eligibility criteria, 72 articles were identified, and 25 were selected for analysis. Data extraction was done by independent reviewers, with a second reviewer ensuring accuracy. Discrepancies were resolved by the corresponding editor. Results: We reviewed data from 13,026 patients who underwent permanent SCS implantation between 1984 and 2024, across 25 studies. A total of 1882 patients (9.82%) underwent explantation. The most common reason was lack of efficacy and inadequate pain relief (38%), followed by lead failure (15%) and infection (14%). While SCS is generally effective, issues related to device longevity and patient satisfaction persist, with explantation rates due to technical failures and lack of efficacy being concerns. Conclusion: SCS efficacy varies, with explantation rates reaching up to 38%, often due to inadequate pain relief. Most explantations occur within the first year, despite SCS being a safe and effective treatment. High implantation costs ($35,000 to $70,000) and revision costs ($15,000 to $25,000) raise concerns among payors. The hardware-driven model limits waveform flexibility, highlighting the need for innovation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1327-1340
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Pain Research
Volume18
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025

Keywords

  • chronic pain
  • cost-effectiveness
  • explantation
  • implant removal
  • spinal cord stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Spinal Cord Stimulation Explantation and Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Technology Recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this