Shoulder Dystocia

Edith D. Gurewitsch, Robert H. Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations


Using an evidence-based, medical approach, the strengths and pitfalls of the causation- and standard-of-care-based arguments proffered by plaintiff and defense counsel in shoulder dystocia- associated birth injury litigation are reviewed based on medical plausibility. The role of the expert witness as arbiter of the relationship between medical care rendered and the untoward outcome of such care is distinguished from that of other court members. Proposed solutions to the medical malpractice litigation crisis are also examined in light of relevant differences in the pathogenetic bases for birth injuries of various types.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)365-385
Number of pages21
JournalClinics in Perinatology
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 2007
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology


Dive into the research topics of 'Shoulder Dystocia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this