Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sex differences among subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: a propensity-matched, multicentre, international analysis from the i-SUSI project

  • Marco Schiavone
  • , Alessio Gasperetti
  • , Julia Vogler
  • , Paolo Compagnucci
  • , Mikael Laredo
  • , Alexander Breitenstein
  • , Simone Gulletta
  • , Martin Martinek
  • , Lukas Kaiser
  • , Fabrizio Tundo
  • , Pietro Palmisano
  • , Giovanni Rovaris
  • , Antonio Curnis
  • , Jürgen Kuschyk
  • , Mauro Biffi
  • , Roland Tilz
  • , Luigi Di Biase
  • , Claudio Tondo
  • , Giovanni B. Forleo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aims Women have been historically underrepresented in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) trials. No data on sex differences regarding subcutaneous ICDs (S-ICD) carriers have been described. Aim of our study was to investigate sex-related differences among unselected S-ICD recipients. Methods and results Consecutive patients enrolled in the multicentre, international i-SUSI registry were analysed. Comparisons between sexes were performed using a 1:1 propensity matching adjusted analysis for age, body mass index (BMI), left ventricular function, and substrate. The primary outcome was the rate of appropriate shocks during follow-up. Inappropriate shocks and other device-related complications were deemed secondary outcomes. A total of 1698 patients were extracted from the i-SUSI registry; 399 (23.5%) were females. After propensity matching, two cohorts of 374 patients presenting similar baseline characteristics were analysed. Despite similar periprocedural characteristics and a matched BMI, women resulted at lower risk of conversion failure as per PRAETORIAN score (73.4% vs. 81.3%, P = 0.049). Over a median follow-up time of 26.5 [12.7–42.5] months, appropriate shocks were more common in the male cohort (rate/year 3.4% vs. 1.7%; log-rank P = 0.049), while no significant differences in device-related complications (rate/year: 6.3% vs. 5.8%; log-rank P = 0.595) and inappropriate shocks (rate/year: 4.3% vs. 3.1%; log-rank P = 0.375) were observed. After controlling for confounders, sex remained significantly associated with the primary outcome (aHR 1.648; CI 0.999–2.655, P = 0.048), while not resulting predictor of inappropriate shocks and device-related complications. Conclusion In a propensity-matched cohort of S-ICD recipients, women are less likely to experience appropriate ICD therapy, while not showing higher risk of device-related complications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbereuae115
JournalEuropace
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2024

Keywords

  • Appropriate shocks
  • Gender differences
  • S-ICD
  • Sex differences
  • Sudden cardiac death

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sex differences among subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: a propensity-matched, multicentre, international analysis from the i-SUSI project'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this