TY - JOUR
T1 - Review of Metformin Use for Type 2 Diabetes Prevention
AU - Moin, Tannaz
AU - Schmittdiel, Julie A.
AU - Flory, James H.
AU - Yeh, Jessica
AU - Karter, Andrew J.
AU - Kruge, Lydia E.
AU - Schillinger, Dean
AU - Mangione, Carol M.
AU - Herman, William H.
AU - Walker, Elizabeth A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Ms. Karen R. Estacio of Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research for her editorial support. TM received support from the Department of Veterans Affairs (QUE 15-272, 15-286); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC; U18DP006140); and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK; R18DK105464). JAS and AJK received support for this work from the Health Delivery Systems Center for Diabetes Translational Research (P30 DK092924). JHF was partially supported by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K08 HS023898-01). HCY was partially supported by NIH grant P30DK079637. CMM received support from the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA); Resource Centers for Minority Aging Research Center for Health Improvement of Minority Elderly under NIH/National Institute of Aging under Grant P30AG021684; by the NIDDK of NIH under Grant R18DK105464; the CDC under Grant U18DP006140; and from NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute under Grant UL1TR000124. CM holds the Barbara A. Levey and Gerald S. Levey Endowed Chair in Medicine, which partially supported her work. WHH was partially support by NIH grant DK092926. EAW received support from NIH grant DK020541 and DK111022. Funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs, CDC, or NIH. CM is a member of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. This article does not necessarily represent the views and policies of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. All authors made substantial contributions to conception and design or analysis and interpretation of data and drafting of the article or critical revision for important intellectual content. TM wrote the first draft of the manuscript. TM, JAS, JF, JY, LD, WH, and EW analyzed the data. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript. TM is the guarantor of this article. TM, JAS, JHF, LK, JHY, CMM, WHH, and EAW have no financial disclosures. AJK receives funding from AstraZeneca, Co., for an unrelated independent investigator study.
Funding Information:
TM received support from the Department of Veterans Affairs (QUE 15-272, 15-286); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC; U18DP006140); and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK; R18DK105464). JAS and AJK received support for this work from the Health Delivery Systems Center for Diabetes Translational Research (P30 DK092924). JHF was partially supported by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K08 HS023898-01). HCY was partially supported by NIH grant P30DK079637. CMM received support from the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA); Resource Centers for Minority Aging Research Center for Health Improvement of Minority Elderly under NIH/National Institute of Aging under Grant P30AG021684; by the NIDDK of NIH under Grant R18DK105464; the CDC under Grant U18DP006140; and from NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute under Grant UL1TR000124. CM holds the Barbara A. Levey and Gerald S. Levey Endowed Chair in Medicine, which partially supported her work. WHH was partially support by NIH grant DK092926. EAW received support from NIH grant DK020541 and DK111022.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - Context: Prediabetes is prevalent and significantly increases lifetime risk of progression to type 2 diabetes. This review summarizes the evidence surrounding metformin use for type 2 diabetes prevention. Evidence acquisition: Articles published between 1998 and 2017 examining metformin use for the primary indication of diabetes prevention available on MEDLINE. Evidence synthesis: Forty articles met inclusion criteria and were summarized into four general categories: (1) RCTs of metformin use for diabetes prevention (n=7 and n=2 follow-up analyses); (2) observational analyses examining metformin use in heterogeneous subgroups of patients with prediabetes (n=9 from the Diabetes Prevention Program, n=1 from the biguanides and the prevention of the risk of obesity [BIGPRO] trial); (3) observational analyses examining cost effectiveness of metformin use for diabetes prevention (n=11 from the Diabetes Prevention Program, n=1 from the Indian Diabetes Prevention Program); and (4) real-world assessments of metformin eligibility or use for diabetes prevention (n=9). Metformin was associated with reduced relative risk of incident diabetes, with the strongest evidence for use in those at highest risk (i.e., aged <60 years, BMI ≥35, and women with histories of gestational diabetes). Metformin was also deemed cost effective in 11 economic analyses. Recent studies highlighted low rates of metformin use for diabetes prevention in real-world settings. Conclusions: Two decades of evidence support metformin use for diabetes prevention among higher-risk patients. However, metformin is not widely used in real-world practice, and enhancing the translation of this evidence to real-world practice has important implications for patients, providers, and payers.
AB - Context: Prediabetes is prevalent and significantly increases lifetime risk of progression to type 2 diabetes. This review summarizes the evidence surrounding metformin use for type 2 diabetes prevention. Evidence acquisition: Articles published between 1998 and 2017 examining metformin use for the primary indication of diabetes prevention available on MEDLINE. Evidence synthesis: Forty articles met inclusion criteria and were summarized into four general categories: (1) RCTs of metformin use for diabetes prevention (n=7 and n=2 follow-up analyses); (2) observational analyses examining metformin use in heterogeneous subgroups of patients with prediabetes (n=9 from the Diabetes Prevention Program, n=1 from the biguanides and the prevention of the risk of obesity [BIGPRO] trial); (3) observational analyses examining cost effectiveness of metformin use for diabetes prevention (n=11 from the Diabetes Prevention Program, n=1 from the Indian Diabetes Prevention Program); and (4) real-world assessments of metformin eligibility or use for diabetes prevention (n=9). Metformin was associated with reduced relative risk of incident diabetes, with the strongest evidence for use in those at highest risk (i.e., aged <60 years, BMI ≥35, and women with histories of gestational diabetes). Metformin was also deemed cost effective in 11 economic analyses. Recent studies highlighted low rates of metformin use for diabetes prevention in real-world settings. Conclusions: Two decades of evidence support metformin use for diabetes prevention among higher-risk patients. However, metformin is not widely used in real-world practice, and enhancing the translation of this evidence to real-world practice has important implications for patients, providers, and payers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051649148&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051649148&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.038
DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.038
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30126667
AN - SCOPUS:85051649148
SN - 0749-3797
VL - 55
SP - 565
EP - 574
JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
IS - 4
ER -