TY - JOUR
T1 - Relationship between catheter forces, lesion characteristics, "popping," and char formation
T2 - Experience with robotic navigation system
AU - Di Biase, Luigi
AU - Natale, Andrea
AU - Barrett, Conor
AU - Tan, Carmela
AU - Elayi, Claude S.
AU - Ching, Chi Keong
AU - Wang, Paul
AU - Al-Ahmad, Amin
AU - Arruda, Mauricio
AU - Burkhardt, J. David
AU - Wisnoskey, Brian J.
AU - Chowdhury, Punam
AU - De Marco, Shari
AU - Armaganijan, Luciana
AU - Litwak, Kenneth N.
AU - Schweikert, Robert A.
AU - Cummings, Jennifer E.
PY - 2009/4/1
Y1 - 2009/4/1
N2 - Force Sensors and Catheter Ablation. Introduction: Popping, char and perforation are complications that can occur following catheter ablation. We measured the amount of grams (g) applied to the endocardium during ablation using a sensor incorporated in the long sheath of a robotic system. We evaluated the relationship between lesion formation, pressure, and the development of complications. Methods: Using a robotic navigation system, lesions were placed in the left atrium (LA) at six settings, using a constant duration (40 seconds) and flow rate of either 17 cc/min or 30 cc/min with an open irrigated catheter (OIC). Evidence of complications was noted and lesion location recorded for later analysis at necropsy. Results: Lesions using 30 Watts (W) were more likely to be transmural at higher (>40 g) than lower (<30 g) pressures (75% vs 25%, P < 0.001). Significantly higher number of lesions using >40 g of pressure demonstrated "popping" and crater formation as compared with lesions with 20-30 g of pressure (41% vs 15%, P = 0.008). A majority of lesions placed using higher power (45 W) with higher pressures (>40 g) were associated with char and crater formation (66.7%). No lesions using 10 g of pressure were transmural, regardless of the power. Lesions placed with a power setting less than 35 W were more likely to result in "relative" sparing of the endocardial surface than lesions at a power setting higher than 35 W (62% vs 33.3%, P = 0.02) regardless of the pressure. Conclusions: When using an OIC, lower power settings (≤35 W) and lower/medium contact pressure were more likely to show a "relative" spared endocardial surface. Overall, contact pressure between 20 g and 30 g and a power setting of 40 W appeared to achieve transmurality by preserving safety.
AB - Force Sensors and Catheter Ablation. Introduction: Popping, char and perforation are complications that can occur following catheter ablation. We measured the amount of grams (g) applied to the endocardium during ablation using a sensor incorporated in the long sheath of a robotic system. We evaluated the relationship between lesion formation, pressure, and the development of complications. Methods: Using a robotic navigation system, lesions were placed in the left atrium (LA) at six settings, using a constant duration (40 seconds) and flow rate of either 17 cc/min or 30 cc/min with an open irrigated catheter (OIC). Evidence of complications was noted and lesion location recorded for later analysis at necropsy. Results: Lesions using 30 Watts (W) were more likely to be transmural at higher (>40 g) than lower (<30 g) pressures (75% vs 25%, P < 0.001). Significantly higher number of lesions using >40 g of pressure demonstrated "popping" and crater formation as compared with lesions with 20-30 g of pressure (41% vs 15%, P = 0.008). A majority of lesions placed using higher power (45 W) with higher pressures (>40 g) were associated with char and crater formation (66.7%). No lesions using 10 g of pressure were transmural, regardless of the power. Lesions placed with a power setting less than 35 W were more likely to result in "relative" sparing of the endocardial surface than lesions at a power setting higher than 35 W (62% vs 33.3%, P = 0.02) regardless of the pressure. Conclusions: When using an OIC, lower power settings (≤35 W) and lower/medium contact pressure were more likely to show a "relative" spared endocardial surface. Overall, contact pressure between 20 g and 30 g and a power setting of 40 W appeared to achieve transmurality by preserving safety.
KW - Catheter ablation
KW - Char
KW - Complications
KW - Force sensors
KW - Left atrium
KW - Perforations
KW - Popping
KW - Remote robotic navigation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=63049135802&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=63049135802&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01355.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01355.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 19017335
AN - SCOPUS:63049135802
SN - 1045-3873
VL - 20
SP - 436
EP - 440
JO - Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
JF - Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
IS - 4
ER -