Reflector-guided breast tumor localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: A comparison of surgical outcomes

Sejal N. Patel; Victoria L. Mango; Priya Jadeja; Lauren Friedlander; Elise Desperito; Ralph Wynn; Sheldon Feldman; Richard Ha

doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.07.020

Reflector-guided breast tumor localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: A comparison of surgical outcomes

Sejal N. Patel, Victoria L. Mango, Priya Jadeja, Lauren Friedlander, Elise Desperito, Ralph Wynn, Sheldon Feldman, Richard Ha

Surgery

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

40 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose To compare surgical outcomes of SAVI SCOUT reflector localization (SSL) versus wire localization (WL) for breast tumors. Methods Retrospective review of 42 SSL cases and 42 WL cases. WL patients were consecutively matched for clinical-pathologic features. Final surgical outcome measures were tumor specimen volume, margin status, and re-excision rates. Results No significant differences were present in median specimen volumes (SSL-15.2 cm³ vs. WL-16.3 cm³), positive margin rate (SSL-9.5% vs. WL-7.1%), close margin rate (SSL-7.1% vs. WL-11.9%) or re-excision rate (SSL-7.1% vs. WL-9.5%). Conclusion SSL is an acceptable alternative to WL with no significant differences in surgical outcomes.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	14-17
Number of pages	4
Journal	Clinical Imaging
Volume	47
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.07.020
State	Published - Jan 2018

Keywords

Breast cancer
Tumor localization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.07.020

Cite this

@article{29e84c26290e4ee4a17b42ad587c40a2,

title = "Reflector-guided breast tumor localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: A comparison of surgical outcomes",

abstract = "Purpose To compare surgical outcomes of SAVI SCOUT reflector localization (SSL) versus wire localization (WL) for breast tumors. Methods Retrospective review of 42 SSL cases and 42 WL cases. WL patients were consecutively matched for clinical-pathologic features. Final surgical outcome measures were tumor specimen volume, margin status, and re-excision rates. Results No significant differences were present in median specimen volumes (SSL-15.2 cm3 vs. WL-16.3 cm3), positive margin rate (SSL-9.5% vs. WL-7.1%), close margin rate (SSL-7.1% vs. WL-11.9%) or re-excision rate (SSL-7.1% vs. WL-9.5%). Conclusion SSL is an acceptable alternative to WL with no significant differences in surgical outcomes.",

keywords = "Breast cancer, Tumor localization",

author = "Patel, {Sejal N.} and Mango, {Victoria L.} and Priya Jadeja and Lauren Friedlander and Elise Desperito and Ralph Wynn and Sheldon Feldman and Richard Ha",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 Elsevier Inc.",

year = "2018",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.07.020",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "47",

pages = "14--17",

journal = "Clinical Imaging",

issn = "0899-7071",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reflector-guided breast tumor localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies

T2 - A comparison of surgical outcomes

AU - Patel, Sejal N.

AU - Mango, Victoria L.

AU - Jadeja, Priya

AU - Friedlander, Lauren

AU - Desperito, Elise

AU - Wynn, Ralph

AU - Feldman, Sheldon

AU - Ha, Richard

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - Purpose To compare surgical outcomes of SAVI SCOUT reflector localization (SSL) versus wire localization (WL) for breast tumors. Methods Retrospective review of 42 SSL cases and 42 WL cases. WL patients were consecutively matched for clinical-pathologic features. Final surgical outcome measures were tumor specimen volume, margin status, and re-excision rates. Results No significant differences were present in median specimen volumes (SSL-15.2 cm3 vs. WL-16.3 cm3), positive margin rate (SSL-9.5% vs. WL-7.1%), close margin rate (SSL-7.1% vs. WL-11.9%) or re-excision rate (SSL-7.1% vs. WL-9.5%). Conclusion SSL is an acceptable alternative to WL with no significant differences in surgical outcomes.

AB - Purpose To compare surgical outcomes of SAVI SCOUT reflector localization (SSL) versus wire localization (WL) for breast tumors. Methods Retrospective review of 42 SSL cases and 42 WL cases. WL patients were consecutively matched for clinical-pathologic features. Final surgical outcome measures were tumor specimen volume, margin status, and re-excision rates. Results No significant differences were present in median specimen volumes (SSL-15.2 cm3 vs. WL-16.3 cm3), positive margin rate (SSL-9.5% vs. WL-7.1%), close margin rate (SSL-7.1% vs. WL-11.9%) or re-excision rate (SSL-7.1% vs. WL-9.5%). Conclusion SSL is an acceptable alternative to WL with no significant differences in surgical outcomes.

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Tumor localization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038211802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038211802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.07.020

DO - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.07.020

M3 - Article

C2 - 28818762

AN - SCOPUS:85038211802

SN - 0899-7071

VL - 47

SP - 14

EP - 17

JO - Clinical Imaging

JF - Clinical Imaging

ER -

Reflector-guided breast tumor localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: A comparison of surgical outcomes

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this