TY - JOUR
T1 - Providing Pediatric Palliative
AU - Moody, Karen
AU - McHugh, Marlene
AU - Baker, Rebecca
AU - Cohen, Hillel
AU - Pinto, Priya
AU - Deutsch, Stephanie
AU - Santizo, Ruth O.
AU - Schechter, Miriam
AU - Fausto, James
AU - Joo, Pablo
N1 - Funding Information:
This initiative was partly supported by a grant from the End of Life/Palliative Care Education Resource Center (EPERC), and by the CTSA Grant 1 UL1 TR001073-01, 1 TL1 TR001072-01, and 1 KL2 TR001071-01 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). EPERC funded and supported an expert in the field of Palliative Care to meet with the study team and assist with curriculum development. NCATS supported a statistician to perform analysis on the data collected.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2018, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2018.
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - Background: The Institute of Medicine and the American Academy of Pediatrics has called for improvement in education and training of pediatricians in pediatric palliative care (PPC). Given the shortage of PPC physicians and the immediate need for PPC medical education, this study reports the outcomes of a problem-based learning (PBL) module facilitated by academic general and subspecialty pediatric faculty (non-PPC specialists) to third year medical students. Objectives/Setting: To test the effectiveness of a PPC-PBL module on third year medical students' and pediatric faculty's declarative knowledge, attitudes toward, perceived exposure, and self-assessed competency in PPC objectives. Design: A PBL module was developed using three PPC learning objectives as a framework: define core concepts in palliative care; list the components of a total pain assessment; and describe key principles in establishing therapeutic relationships with patients. A PPC physician and nurse practitioner guided pediatric faculty on facilitating the PPC-PBL. In Part 1, students identified domains of palliative care for a child with refractory leukemia and self-assigned questions to research and present at the follow-up session. In Part 2, students were expected to develop a care plan demonstrating the three PPC objectives. Measurements: Measures included a knowledge exam and a survey instrument to assess secondary outcomes. Results: Students' declarative knowledge, perceived exposure, and self-assessed competency in all three PPC learning objectives improved significantly after the PPC-PBL, p = 0.002, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively. There were no significant differences in faculty knowledge test scores from baseline to follow-up, but scores were generally high (median >80%). Students and faculty rated palliative care education as "important or very important" at baseline and follow-up. Conclusions: This study suggests that key concepts in PPC can be taught to medical students utilizing a PBL format and pediatric faculty resulting in improved knowledge and self-assessed competency in PPC.
AB - Background: The Institute of Medicine and the American Academy of Pediatrics has called for improvement in education and training of pediatricians in pediatric palliative care (PPC). Given the shortage of PPC physicians and the immediate need for PPC medical education, this study reports the outcomes of a problem-based learning (PBL) module facilitated by academic general and subspecialty pediatric faculty (non-PPC specialists) to third year medical students. Objectives/Setting: To test the effectiveness of a PPC-PBL module on third year medical students' and pediatric faculty's declarative knowledge, attitudes toward, perceived exposure, and self-assessed competency in PPC objectives. Design: A PBL module was developed using three PPC learning objectives as a framework: define core concepts in palliative care; list the components of a total pain assessment; and describe key principles in establishing therapeutic relationships with patients. A PPC physician and nurse practitioner guided pediatric faculty on facilitating the PPC-PBL. In Part 1, students identified domains of palliative care for a child with refractory leukemia and self-assigned questions to research and present at the follow-up session. In Part 2, students were expected to develop a care plan demonstrating the three PPC objectives. Measurements: Measures included a knowledge exam and a survey instrument to assess secondary outcomes. Results: Students' declarative knowledge, perceived exposure, and self-assessed competency in all three PPC learning objectives improved significantly after the PPC-PBL, p = 0.002, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively. There were no significant differences in faculty knowledge test scores from baseline to follow-up, but scores were generally high (median >80%). Students and faculty rated palliative care education as "important or very important" at baseline and follow-up. Conclusions: This study suggests that key concepts in PPC can be taught to medical students utilizing a PBL format and pediatric faculty resulting in improved knowledge and self-assessed competency in PPC.
KW - curriculum
KW - medical
KW - palliative care
KW - pediatrics
KW - problem-based learning
KW - students
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040459432&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040459432&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/jpm.2017.0154
DO - 10.1089/jpm.2017.0154
M3 - Article
C2 - 28768111
AN - SCOPUS:85040459432
SN - 1096-6218
VL - 21
SP - 22
EP - 27
JO - Journal of palliative medicine
JF - Journal of palliative medicine
IS - 1
ER -