TY - JOUR
T1 - Pretreatment behavior and subsequent medication effects in childhood absence epilepsy
AU - Shinnar, Ruth C.
AU - Shinnar, Shlomo
AU - Cnaan, Avital
AU - Clark, Peggy
AU - Dlugos, Dennis
AU - Hirtz, Deborah G.
AU - Hu, Fengming
AU - Liu, Chunyan
AU - Masur, David
AU - Weiss, Erica F.
AU - Glauser, Tracy A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by NIH (U01-NS045911 and U01-NS045803).
Funding Information:
R.C. Shinnar is funded by NIH grants 2R37NS043209 and 2U01-NS045911 and by a grant from Rett Syndrome Research Trust. S. Shinnar is funded by NIH grants 2R37-NS043209, 2U01-NS045911, U10NS077308, 1U01NS088034, and 1R01NS094257; serves on the editorial board of Pediatric Neurology; serves on 2 DSMBs for UCB Pharma and a DSMB for Eisai; has received personal compensation for consulting for Malinckrodt, Neurelis, Upsher-Smith, and Xeris; has received royalties from Elsevier for coediting Febrile Seizures; serves as an expert consultant for the US Department of Justice; and has received compensation for work as an expert on medico-legal cases. A. Cnaan was funded by NIH grants 2U01-NS045911, UL1RR031988, P30HD040677, P50AR060836, R01AR061875, and R01HD058567, Department of Defense grants W81XWH-09-1-0592 and W81XWH-12-1-0417, and Department of Education grant H133B090001. P. Clark is funded by NIH grants 2U01-NS045911 and U10-NS077311 and has received consulting and speaking fees from Eisai and Supernus. D. Dlugos is funded by NIH grants 1R01NS053998, 2U01NS045911, 1R01LM011124, and U01NS077276, by the Epilepsy Study Consortium, and by prestudy protocol development agreements with Insys Therapeutics and Bio-Pharm Solutions, and has given expert testimony in medico-legal cases. D. Hirtz reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. F. Hu was funded by NIH grants 2U01-NS045911, P30HD040677, P50AR060836, R01AR061875, and R01HD058567, Department of Defense grants W81XWH-09-1-0592 and W81XWH-12-1-0417, and Department of Education grant H133B090001. C. Liu reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. D. Masur is funded by NIH grants 2R37NS043209 and 2U01-NS045911 and has given expert testimony in medico-legal cases. E. Weiss is funded by NIH grants 2R37NS043209, 2U01-NS045911, and R01-AG046949. T. Glauser is funded by NIH grants 2U01-NS045911, U10-NS077311, R01-NS053998, R01-NS062756, R01-NS043209, R01-LM011124, and R01-NS065840; has received consulting fees from Supernus, Sunovion, Eisai, UCB, Lundbeck, and Questcor; serves as an expert consultant for the US Department of Justice; has received compensation for work as an expert on medico-legal cases; and receives royalties from a patent license. Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Academy of Neurology.
PY - 2017/10/17
Y1 - 2017/10/17
N2 - Objective: To characterize pretreatment behavioral problems and differential effects of initial therapy in children with childhood absence epilepsy (CAE). Methods: The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) was administered at baseline, week 16-20, and month 12 visits of a randomized double-blind trial of ethosuximide, lamotrigine, and valproate. Total problems score was the primary outcome measure. Results: A total of 382 participants at baseline, 310 participants at the week 16-20 visit, and 168 participants at the month 12 visit had CBCL data. At baseline, 8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6%-11%) of children with CAE had elevated total problems scores (mean 52.9 ± 10.91). At week 16-20, participants taking valproic acid had significantly higher total problems (51.7 [98.3% CI 48.6-54.7]), externalizing problems (51.4 [98.3% CI 48.5-54.3]), attention problems (57.8 [98.3% CI 55.6-60.0]), and attention-deficit/hyperactivity problems (55.8 [98.3% CI 54.1-57.6]) scores compared to participants taking ethosuximide (46.5 [98.3% CI 43.4-49.6]; 45.8 [98.3% CI 42.9-48.7]; 54.6 [98.3% CI 52.4-56.9]; 53.0 [98.3% CI 51.3-54.8]). Lack of seizure freedom and elevated week 16-20 Conner Continuous Performance Test confidence index were associated with worse total problems scores. At month 12, participants taking valproic acid had significantly higher attention problems scores (57.9 [98.3% CI 55.6-60.3]) compared to participants taking ethosuximide (54.5 [95% CI 52.1-56.9]). Conclusions: Pretreatment and ongoing behavioral problems exist in CAE. Valproic acid is associated with worse behavioral outcomes than ethosuximide or lamotrigine, further reinforcing ethosuximide as the preferred initial therapy for CAE. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00088452. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that for children with CAE, valproic acid is associated with worse behavioral outcomes than ethosuximide or lamotrigine.
AB - Objective: To characterize pretreatment behavioral problems and differential effects of initial therapy in children with childhood absence epilepsy (CAE). Methods: The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) was administered at baseline, week 16-20, and month 12 visits of a randomized double-blind trial of ethosuximide, lamotrigine, and valproate. Total problems score was the primary outcome measure. Results: A total of 382 participants at baseline, 310 participants at the week 16-20 visit, and 168 participants at the month 12 visit had CBCL data. At baseline, 8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6%-11%) of children with CAE had elevated total problems scores (mean 52.9 ± 10.91). At week 16-20, participants taking valproic acid had significantly higher total problems (51.7 [98.3% CI 48.6-54.7]), externalizing problems (51.4 [98.3% CI 48.5-54.3]), attention problems (57.8 [98.3% CI 55.6-60.0]), and attention-deficit/hyperactivity problems (55.8 [98.3% CI 54.1-57.6]) scores compared to participants taking ethosuximide (46.5 [98.3% CI 43.4-49.6]; 45.8 [98.3% CI 42.9-48.7]; 54.6 [98.3% CI 52.4-56.9]; 53.0 [98.3% CI 51.3-54.8]). Lack of seizure freedom and elevated week 16-20 Conner Continuous Performance Test confidence index were associated with worse total problems scores. At month 12, participants taking valproic acid had significantly higher attention problems scores (57.9 [98.3% CI 55.6-60.3]) compared to participants taking ethosuximide (54.5 [95% CI 52.1-56.9]). Conclusions: Pretreatment and ongoing behavioral problems exist in CAE. Valproic acid is associated with worse behavioral outcomes than ethosuximide or lamotrigine, further reinforcing ethosuximide as the preferred initial therapy for CAE. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00088452. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that for children with CAE, valproic acid is associated with worse behavioral outcomes than ethosuximide or lamotrigine.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031403677&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031403677&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004514
DO - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004514
M3 - Article
C2 - 28916534
AN - SCOPUS:85031403677
SN - 0028-3878
VL - 89
SP - 1698
EP - 1706
JO - Neurology
JF - Neurology
IS - 16
ER -