Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Presurgical nasoalveolar molding and primary gingivoperiosteoplasty reduce the need for bone grafting in patients with bilateral clefts

  • Wojciech Dec
  • , Pradip R. Shetye
  • , Edward H. Davidson
  • , Barry H. Grayson
  • , Lawrence E. Brecht
  • , Court B. Cutting
  • , Stephen M. Warren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Preoperative nasoalveolar molding (NAM) in combination with primary gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) reduces the need for secondary alveolar bone grafting by 60% in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (CL/P). Herein, we investigate the efficacy of NAM and primary GPP in patients with bilateral CL/P. All patients (n = 38) with bilateral CL/P who underwent NAM and primary GPP from 1988 to 1998 with at least 14 years of follow-up were included in this study. Panoramic and periapical radiographs were used to assess dentoalveolar bone formation. A total of 38 patients were identified with median follow-up of 18 years (range 14-26 years). Of the 27 patients who underwent bilateral GPP, 14 (51%) patients had successful dentoalveolar bone formation bilaterally and 13 (49%) had unilateral bone formation. No patient had a bilateral failure. Of the 11 patients who underwent unilateral GPP, 7 (63%) patients had successful dentoalveolar bone formation. Bilateral successful dentoalveolar bone formation following primary bilateral GPP has a dependent probability of 52% and a conditional probability of 82%.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)186-190
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cleft lip
  • bilateral
  • bone grafting
  • cleft alveolus
  • cleft palate
  • nasoalveolar molding
  • presurgical orthopedics
  • primary gingivoperiosteoplasty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Presurgical nasoalveolar molding and primary gingivoperiosteoplasty reduce the need for bone grafting in patients with bilateral clefts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this