TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes of arteriovenous malformations with single versus multiple draining veins
T2 - A multicenter study
AU - On Behalf of the MISTA consortium
AU - Musmar, Basel
AU - Abdalrazeq, Hammam
AU - Adeeb, Nimer
AU - Roy, Joanna M.
AU - Aslan, Assala
AU - Tjoumakaris, Stavropoula I.
AU - Salim, Hamza Adel
AU - Ogilvy, Christopher S.
AU - Baskaya, Mustafa K.
AU - Kondziolka, Douglas
AU - Sheehan, Jason
AU - Riina, Howard
AU - Kandregula, Sandeep
AU - Dmytriw, Adam A.
AU - Abushehab, Abdallah
AU - El Naamani, Kareem
AU - Abdelsalam, Ahmed
AU - Ironside, Natasha
AU - Kumbhare, Deepak
AU - Gummadi, Sanjeev
AU - Ataoglu, Cagdas
AU - Essibayi, Muhammed Amir
AU - Keles, Abdullah
AU - Muram, Sandeep
AU - Sconzo, Daniel
AU - Rezai, Arwin
AU - Alwakaa, Omar
AU - Tos, Salem M.
AU - Mantziaris, Georgios
AU - Park, Min S.
AU - Erginoglu, Ufuk
AU - Pöppe, Johannes
AU - Sen, Rajeev D.
AU - Griessenauer, Christoph J.
AU - Burkhardt, Jan Karl
AU - Starke, Robert M.
AU - Sekhar, Laligam N.
AU - Levitt, Michael R.
AU - Altschul, David J.
AU - Haranhalli, Neil
AU - McAvoy, Malia
AU - Zeineddine, Hussein A.
AU - Abla, Adib A.
AU - Sizdahkhani, Saman
AU - Koduri, Sravanthi
AU - Atallah, Elias
AU - Karadimas, Spyridon
AU - Gooch, M. Reid
AU - Rosenwasser, Robert H.
AU - Stapleton, Christopher
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024
PY - 2025/6/15
Y1 - 2025/6/15
N2 - Background: Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are complex vascular lesions that pose a risk for hemorrhagic stroke. The number of draining veins has recently emerged as a significant predictor of rupture risk. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the outcomes in adult AVM patients with single versus multiple draining veins. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 735 AVM patients from the Multicenter International Study for Treatment of Brain AVMs (MISTA) database. Patients were categorized into single draining vein (n = 430) and multiple draining veins (n = 305) groups. Logistic and linear regression models were used to assess outcomes, adjusting for baseline characteristics, including age, rupture status, Spetzler-Martin grade, and other relevant factors. Results: After adjustment, no significant differences were observed in complete AVM obliteration at last follow-up between the multiple and single draining veins groups (OR: 1.1; 95 % CI: 0.72–1.93, p = 0.49) after any treatment type. Good functional outcomes at last follow-up (mRS 0–2) were similar between the two groups (OR: 1.00; 95 % CI: 0.48–2.09, p = 0.98), as were retreatment rates (OR: 1.68; 95 % CI: 0.74–3.83, p = 0.21). Ruptured AVMs were more common in the single draining vein group (52.0 % vs. 35.4 %, p < 0.001). Patients in the multiple draining vein group had lower odds of hemorrhagic complications compared to the single vein group (OR: 0.38; 95 % CI: 0.14–1.02, p = 0.05). Conclusion: Single draining vein AVMs were more likely to present with rupture, but no significant differences in obliteration rates, functional outcomes, or retreatment rates were found between the groups after adjustment. These findings suggest that while venous drainage patterns may influence initial presentation, they do not appear to affect overall treatment success or patient prognosis after any treatment type. Further studies are needed to confirm.
AB - Background: Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are complex vascular lesions that pose a risk for hemorrhagic stroke. The number of draining veins has recently emerged as a significant predictor of rupture risk. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the outcomes in adult AVM patients with single versus multiple draining veins. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 735 AVM patients from the Multicenter International Study for Treatment of Brain AVMs (MISTA) database. Patients were categorized into single draining vein (n = 430) and multiple draining veins (n = 305) groups. Logistic and linear regression models were used to assess outcomes, adjusting for baseline characteristics, including age, rupture status, Spetzler-Martin grade, and other relevant factors. Results: After adjustment, no significant differences were observed in complete AVM obliteration at last follow-up between the multiple and single draining veins groups (OR: 1.1; 95 % CI: 0.72–1.93, p = 0.49) after any treatment type. Good functional outcomes at last follow-up (mRS 0–2) were similar between the two groups (OR: 1.00; 95 % CI: 0.48–2.09, p = 0.98), as were retreatment rates (OR: 1.68; 95 % CI: 0.74–3.83, p = 0.21). Ruptured AVMs were more common in the single draining vein group (52.0 % vs. 35.4 %, p < 0.001). Patients in the multiple draining vein group had lower odds of hemorrhagic complications compared to the single vein group (OR: 0.38; 95 % CI: 0.14–1.02, p = 0.05). Conclusion: Single draining vein AVMs were more likely to present with rupture, but no significant differences in obliteration rates, functional outcomes, or retreatment rates were found between the groups after adjustment. These findings suggest that while venous drainage patterns may influence initial presentation, they do not appear to affect overall treatment success or patient prognosis after any treatment type. Further studies are needed to confirm.
KW - AVM
KW - Multicenter
KW - Multiple draining vein
KW - Outcomes
KW - Single draining vein
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105002846232
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105002846232#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.jns.2025.123503
DO - 10.1016/j.jns.2025.123503
M3 - Article
C2 - 40262450
AN - SCOPUS:105002846232
SN - 0022-510X
VL - 473
JO - Journal of the Neurological Sciences
JF - Journal of the Neurological Sciences
M1 - 123503
ER -