TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimization of methylated DNA markers to rule out endometrial cancer in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding
AU - Bakkum-Gamez, Jamie N.
AU - Harrington, Shariska P.
AU - Slettedahl, Seth W.
AU - Berger, Calise K.
AU - Krakowski, Katelyn N.
AU - Lemens, Maureen A.
AU - Burger, Kelli N.
AU - Gonser, Anna M.
AU - Taylor, William R.
AU - Mahoney, Douglas W.
AU - Foote, Patrick H.
AU - Sherman, Mark E.
AU - Laughlin-Tommaso, Shannon K.
AU - Hopkins, Matthew R.
AU - Butler, Kristina A.
AU - DeStephano, Christopher C.
AU - Schoolmeester, J. Kenneth
AU - Phifer-Combs, Olivia
AU - McCullagh, Kelly
AU - AlHilli, Mariam M.
AU - Davidson, Emily R.W.
AU - Uribasterra, Pablo
AU - Saad, Andre Hani
AU - Miller, Joyce
AU - Kilts, Toni M.
AU - Finkelstein, Kenneth
AU - Lievano, Guillermo
AU - Mills, Kathryn A.
AU - Lessard-Anderson, Collette R.
AU - Gattoc, Leda Portia
AU - Kroll, Laura
AU - Narula, Gagandeep
AU - Schroeder, Paige
AU - Hanson, Hallie
AU - Harings, Kathleen
AU - Krockenberger, Martin
AU - Beer, Tomasz M.
AU - Kielar-Grevstad, Elle
AU - Gagrat, Bridget Z.
AU - Olson, Marilyn C.
AU - Kisiel, John B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2026/5
Y1 - 2026/5
N2 - Introduction: While only 5–10% of postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) and perimenopausal abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) represents an underlying endometrial cancer (EC) or precancerous lesion, the current standard of care recommends endometrial sampling to evaluate all presenting with this clinical concern. We aimed to develop a highly sensitive panel of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) to identify patients with underlying EC through less invasive testing of self-collected vaginal fluid. Methods: Patients with AUB/PMB ≥45 years or EC or atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) ≥18 years were prospectively enrolled to self-collect vaginal fluid using a tampon. Bisulfite-converted DNA from vaginal fluid was assayed with long-probe quantitative amplified signal (LQAS) for the quantification of MDM signal. Samples were tested with the goal of building a parsimonious model to discriminate EC from benign endometrium (BE). This marker reduction study started with 19 previously identified MDMs. Down-selection was then performed on a panel of 12 MDMs in an independent marker selection study. A random forest model was developed and validated in an independent test set. Results: In marker reduction, a 19-MDM model achieved a sensitivity of 91% (83–96%) in EC with a specificity of 87% (80–92%) observed in BE in an independent set. In marker selection, a 2-MDM model generated a sensitivity for EC of 96% (84–99%), specificity of 82% (67–91%), and an AUC of 0.97 (0.94–1) in an independent test set. Conclusions: Rigorous marker reduction from 19 MDMs to 12 allowed for marker selection of a 2-MDM panel with high sensitivity and specificity to detect EC in vaginal fluid.
AB - Introduction: While only 5–10% of postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) and perimenopausal abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) represents an underlying endometrial cancer (EC) or precancerous lesion, the current standard of care recommends endometrial sampling to evaluate all presenting with this clinical concern. We aimed to develop a highly sensitive panel of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) to identify patients with underlying EC through less invasive testing of self-collected vaginal fluid. Methods: Patients with AUB/PMB ≥45 years or EC or atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) ≥18 years were prospectively enrolled to self-collect vaginal fluid using a tampon. Bisulfite-converted DNA from vaginal fluid was assayed with long-probe quantitative amplified signal (LQAS) for the quantification of MDM signal. Samples were tested with the goal of building a parsimonious model to discriminate EC from benign endometrium (BE). This marker reduction study started with 19 previously identified MDMs. Down-selection was then performed on a panel of 12 MDMs in an independent marker selection study. A random forest model was developed and validated in an independent test set. Results: In marker reduction, a 19-MDM model achieved a sensitivity of 91% (83–96%) in EC with a specificity of 87% (80–92%) observed in BE in an independent set. In marker selection, a 2-MDM model generated a sensitivity for EC of 96% (84–99%), specificity of 82% (67–91%), and an AUC of 0.97 (0.94–1) in an independent test set. Conclusions: Rigorous marker reduction from 19 MDMs to 12 allowed for marker selection of a 2-MDM panel with high sensitivity and specificity to detect EC in vaginal fluid.
KW - Cell-free nucleic acids
KW - DNA methylation
KW - Endometrial cancer
KW - Endometrial neoplasm/diagnosis
KW - Endometrial neoplasm/prevention & control
KW - Liquid biopsy
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105035160808
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105035160808#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2026.03.013
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2026.03.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 41965218
AN - SCOPUS:105035160808
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 208
SP - 91
EP - 99
JO - Gynecologic Oncology
JF - Gynecologic Oncology
ER -