TY - JOUR
T1 - Obstetrical, perinatal, and genetic outcomes associated with nonreportable prenatal cell-free DNA screening results
AU - Norton, Mary E.
AU - MacPherson, Cora
AU - Demko, Zachary
AU - Egbert, Melissa
AU - Malone, Fergal
AU - Wapner, Ronald J.
AU - Roman, Ashley S.
AU - Khalil, Asma
AU - Faro, Revital
AU - Madankumar, Rajeevi
AU - Strong, Noel
AU - Haeri, Sina
AU - Silver, Robert
AU - Vohra, Nidhi
AU - Hyett, Jon
AU - Martin, Kimberly
AU - Rabinowitz, Matthew
AU - Jacobsson, Bo
AU - Dar, Pe'er
N1 - Funding Information:
All the site principal investigators (M.E.N., C.M., F.M., R.J.W., A.S.R., A.K., R.F., R.M., N.S., S.H., R.S., N.V., J.H., B.J., and P.D.) received institutional research support from the funding sponsor (Natera). M.E., Z.D., and M.R. are employed by the study’s funding sponsor (Natera) and hold stock or options to hold stock. K.M. is a consultant to the funding sponsor (Natera) and holds stock and options to hold stock. J.H. has an ongoing research collaboration that includes financial support for biochemical analytes from PerkinElmer; has earned honoraria and/or given talks that were not compensated by Natera, Roche, or Canon; and has participated in Asian/Australasian expert consultancies for Natera and Roche. B.J. reports research clinical diagnostic trials with Ariosa Diagnostics (completed), Vanadis Diagnostics (completed), Natera (ongoing), and Hologic (completed), with institutional expenditures reimbursed per patient and no personal reimbursements. He also reports clinical probiotic studies with products provided by Fuko Pharma (ongoing, no funding) and BioGaia (ongoing; also provided a research grant for the specific study), coordination of scientific conferences, and meetings with commercial partners such as the European Spontaneous Preterm Birth Congress 2016 and a Nordic educational meeting about noninvasive prenatal testing and preeclampsia screening. B.J. collaborated in the IMPACT study, for which Roche, PerkinElmer, and Thermo Fisher Scientific provided reagents for placental growth factor analyses. R.J.W. receives research funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and support from Illumina for research reagents. M.E.N. is a consultant to Luna Genetics. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest.
Funding Information:
All the site principal investigators (M.E.N., C.M., F.M., R.J.W., A.S.R., A.K., R.F., R.M., N.S., S.H., R.S., N.V., J.H., B.J., and P.D.) received institutional research support from the funding sponsor (Natera). M.E., Z.D., and M.R. are employed by the study's funding sponsor (Natera) and hold stock or options to hold stock. K.M. is a consultant to the funding sponsor (Natera) and holds stock and options to hold stock. J.H. has an ongoing research collaboration that includes financial support for biochemical analytes from PerkinElmer; has earned honoraria and/or given talks that were not compensated by Natera, Roche, or Canon; and has participated in Asian/Australasian expert consultancies for Natera and Roche. B.J. reports research clinical diagnostic trials with Ariosa Diagnostics (completed), Vanadis Diagnostics (completed), Natera (ongoing), and Hologic (completed), with institutional expenditures reimbursed per patient and no personal reimbursements. He also reports clinical probiotic studies with products provided by Fuko Pharma (ongoing, no funding) and BioGaia (ongoing; also provided a research grant for the specific study), coordination of scientific conferences, and meetings with commercial partners such as the European Spontaneous Preterm Birth Congress 2016 and a Nordic educational meeting about noninvasive prenatal testing and preeclampsia screening. B.J. collaborated in the IMPACT study, for which Roche, PerkinElmer, and Thermo Fisher Scientific provided reagents for placental growth factor analyses. R.J.W. receives research funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and support from Illumina for research reagents. M.E.N. is a consultant to Luna Genetics. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest. Funding was provided by Natera. The study was a collaboration between the clinical investigators and the funding sponsor (Natera). P.D. and M.E.N. designed the protocol in collaboration with the sponsor (M.E., Z.D., K.M., and M.R.) and also collaborated on the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication. There were no confidentiality agreements pertaining to study results between the authors, sites, or sponsor. Data sharing requests should be submitted to the corresponding author (M.E.N.) for consideration. Requests will be considered by the study publication committee, and access may be limited by patient consent considerations. Study protocol and statistical analysis plan will be available upon request. Individual patient data will not be available. Access to deidentified data may be granted following submission of a written proposal and a signed data sharing agreement. Files will be shared using a secure file transfer protocol. Data will be available immediately following publication and ending 1 year after article publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: The clinical implications of nonreportable cell-free DNA screening results are uncertain, but such results may indicate poor placental implantation in some cases and be associated with adverse obstetrical and perinatal outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to assess the outcomes of pregnancies with nonreportable cell-free DNA screening in a cohort of patients with complete genetic and obstetrical outcomes. Study Design: This was a prespecified secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study of prenatal cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Participants who underwent cell-free DNA screening from April 2015 through January 2019 were offered participation. Obstetrical outcomes and neonatal genetic testing results were collected from 21 primary-care and referral centers in the United States, Europe, and Australia. The primary outcome was risk for adverse obstetrical and perinatal outcomes (aneuploidy, preterm birth at <28, <34, and <37 weeks’ gestation, preeclampsia, small for gestational age or birthweight <10th percentile for gestational week, and a composite outcome that included preterm birth at <37 weeks, preeclampsia, small for gestational age, and stillbirth at >20 weeks) after nonreportable cell-free DNA screening because of low fetal fraction or other causes. Multivariable analyses were performed, adjusting for variables known to be associated with obstetrical and perinatal outcomes, nonreportable results, or fetal fraction. Results: In total, 25,199 pregnant individuals were screened, and 20,194 were enrolled. Genetic confirmation was missing in 1165 (5.8%), 1085 (5.4%) were lost to follow-up, and 93 (0.5%) withdrew; the final study cohort included 17,851 (88.4%) participants who had cell-free DNA, fetal or newborn genetic confirmatory testing, and obstetrical and perinatal outcomes collected. Results were nonreportable in 602 (3.4%) participants. A sample was redrawn and testing attempted again in 427; in 112 (26.2%) participants, results were again nonreportable. Nonreportable results were associated with higher body mass index, chronic hypertension, later gestational age, lower fetal fraction, and Black race. Trisomy 13, 18, or 21 was confirmed in 1.6% with nonreportable tests vs 0.7% with reported results (P=.013). Rates of preterm birth at <28, 34, and 37 weeks, preeclampsia, and the composite outcome were higher among participants with nonreportable results, and further increased among those with a second nonreportable test, whereas the rate of small for gestational age infants was not increased. After adjustment for confounders, the adjusted odds ratios were 2.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.1–4.4) and 2.6 (95% confidence interval, 0.6–10.8) for aneuploidy, and 1.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.2–1.8) and 2.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.4–3.2) for the composite outcome after a first and second nonreportable test, respectively. Of the patients with nonreportable tests, 94.9% had a live birth, as opposed to 98.8% of those with reported test results (adjusted odds ratio for livebirth, 0.20 [95% confidence interval, 0.13–0.30]). Conclusion: Patients with nonreportable cell-free DNA results are at increased risk for a number of adverse outcomes, including aneuploidy, preeclampsia, and preterm birth. They should be offered diagnostic genetic testing, and clinicians should be aware of the increased risk of pregnancy complications.
AB - Background: The clinical implications of nonreportable cell-free DNA screening results are uncertain, but such results may indicate poor placental implantation in some cases and be associated with adverse obstetrical and perinatal outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to assess the outcomes of pregnancies with nonreportable cell-free DNA screening in a cohort of patients with complete genetic and obstetrical outcomes. Study Design: This was a prespecified secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study of prenatal cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Participants who underwent cell-free DNA screening from April 2015 through January 2019 were offered participation. Obstetrical outcomes and neonatal genetic testing results were collected from 21 primary-care and referral centers in the United States, Europe, and Australia. The primary outcome was risk for adverse obstetrical and perinatal outcomes (aneuploidy, preterm birth at <28, <34, and <37 weeks’ gestation, preeclampsia, small for gestational age or birthweight <10th percentile for gestational week, and a composite outcome that included preterm birth at <37 weeks, preeclampsia, small for gestational age, and stillbirth at >20 weeks) after nonreportable cell-free DNA screening because of low fetal fraction or other causes. Multivariable analyses were performed, adjusting for variables known to be associated with obstetrical and perinatal outcomes, nonreportable results, or fetal fraction. Results: In total, 25,199 pregnant individuals were screened, and 20,194 were enrolled. Genetic confirmation was missing in 1165 (5.8%), 1085 (5.4%) were lost to follow-up, and 93 (0.5%) withdrew; the final study cohort included 17,851 (88.4%) participants who had cell-free DNA, fetal or newborn genetic confirmatory testing, and obstetrical and perinatal outcomes collected. Results were nonreportable in 602 (3.4%) participants. A sample was redrawn and testing attempted again in 427; in 112 (26.2%) participants, results were again nonreportable. Nonreportable results were associated with higher body mass index, chronic hypertension, later gestational age, lower fetal fraction, and Black race. Trisomy 13, 18, or 21 was confirmed in 1.6% with nonreportable tests vs 0.7% with reported results (P=.013). Rates of preterm birth at <28, 34, and 37 weeks, preeclampsia, and the composite outcome were higher among participants with nonreportable results, and further increased among those with a second nonreportable test, whereas the rate of small for gestational age infants was not increased. After adjustment for confounders, the adjusted odds ratios were 2.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.1–4.4) and 2.6 (95% confidence interval, 0.6–10.8) for aneuploidy, and 1.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.2–1.8) and 2.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.4–3.2) for the composite outcome after a first and second nonreportable test, respectively. Of the patients with nonreportable tests, 94.9% had a live birth, as opposed to 98.8% of those with reported test results (adjusted odds ratio for livebirth, 0.20 [95% confidence interval, 0.13–0.30]). Conclusion: Patients with nonreportable cell-free DNA results are at increased risk for a number of adverse outcomes, including aneuploidy, preeclampsia, and preterm birth. They should be offered diagnostic genetic testing, and clinicians should be aware of the increased risk of pregnancy complications.
KW - adverse perinatal outcomes
KW - cell-free DNA screening
KW - noninvasive prenatal screening
KW - preeclampsia
KW - preterm birth
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85153957394&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85153957394&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.03.026
DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.03.026
M3 - Article
C2 - 36965866
AN - SCOPUS:85153957394
SN - 0002-9378
JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ER -