TY - JOUR
T1 - Increased response to altered auditory feedback in dyslexia
T2 - A weaker sensorimotor magnet implied in the phonological deficit
AU - van den Bunt, Mark R.
AU - Groen, Margriet A.
AU - Ito, Takayuki
AU - Francisco, Ana A.
AU - Gracco, Vincent L.
AU - Pugh, Ken R.
AU - Verhoeven, Ludo
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by National Institute of Health Grant P01HD 001994 (awarded to Jay Rueckl).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
PY - 2017/3
Y1 - 2017/3
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine whether developmental dyslexia (DD) is characterized by deficiencies in speech sensory and motor feedforward and feedback mechanisms, which are involved in the modulation of phonological representations. Method: A total of 42 adult native speakers of Dutch (22 adults with DD; 20 participants who were typically reading controls) were asked to produce /bep/ while the first formant (F1) of the /e/ was not altered (baseline), increased (ramp), held at maximal perturbation (hold), and not altered again (after-effect). The F1 of the produced utterance was measured for each trial and used for statistical analyses. The measured F1s produced during each phase were entered in a linear mixed-effects model. Results: Participants with DD adapted more strongly during the ramp phase and returned to baseline to a lesser extent when feedback was back to normal (after-effect phase) when compared with the typically reading group. In this study, a faster deviation from baseline during the ramp phase, a stronger adaptation response during the hold phase, and a slower return to baseline during the after-effect phase were associated with poorer reading and phonological abilities. Conclusion: The data of the current study are consistent with the notion that the phonological deficit in DD is associated with a weaker sensorimotor magnet for phonological representations.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine whether developmental dyslexia (DD) is characterized by deficiencies in speech sensory and motor feedforward and feedback mechanisms, which are involved in the modulation of phonological representations. Method: A total of 42 adult native speakers of Dutch (22 adults with DD; 20 participants who were typically reading controls) were asked to produce /bep/ while the first formant (F1) of the /e/ was not altered (baseline), increased (ramp), held at maximal perturbation (hold), and not altered again (after-effect). The F1 of the produced utterance was measured for each trial and used for statistical analyses. The measured F1s produced during each phase were entered in a linear mixed-effects model. Results: Participants with DD adapted more strongly during the ramp phase and returned to baseline to a lesser extent when feedback was back to normal (after-effect phase) when compared with the typically reading group. In this study, a faster deviation from baseline during the ramp phase, a stronger adaptation response during the hold phase, and a slower return to baseline during the after-effect phase were associated with poorer reading and phonological abilities. Conclusion: The data of the current study are consistent with the notion that the phonological deficit in DD is associated with a weaker sensorimotor magnet for phonological representations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016167223&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016167223&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-16-0201
DO - 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-16-0201
M3 - Article
C2 - 28257585
AN - SCOPUS:85016167223
SN - 1092-4388
VL - 60
SP - 654
EP - 667
JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
IS - 3
ER -