TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of uncontrolled hypertension on atrial fibrillation ablation outcome
AU - Santoro, Francesco
AU - Di Biase, Luigi
AU - Trivedi, Chintan
AU - Burkhardt, John David
AU - Paoletti Perini, Alessandro
AU - Sanchez, Javier
AU - Horton, Rodney
AU - Mohanty, Prasant
AU - Mohanty, Sanghamitra
AU - Bai, Rong
AU - Santangeli, Pasquale
AU - Lakkireddy, Dhanunjay
AU - Reddy, Madhu
AU - Elayi, Claude Samy
AU - Hongo, Richard
AU - Beheiry, Salwa
AU - Hao, Steven
AU - Schweikert, Robert A.
AU - Viles-Gonzalez, Juan
AU - Fassini, Gaetano
AU - Casella, Michela
AU - Dello Russo, Antonio
AU - Tondo, Claudio
AU - Natale, Andrea
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation Published By Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2015/6
Y1 - 2015/6
N2 - Objectives The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of hypertension on the outcome of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Background Hypertension is a well-known independent risk factor for incident AF. Methods A total of 531 consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation were enrolled in this study and divided into 3 groups: patients with uncontrolled hypertension despite medical treatment (group I, n = 160), patients with controlled hypertension (group II, n = 192), and patients without hypertension (group III, n = 179). Pulmonary vein (PV) antrum and posterior wall isolation was always performed, and non-PV triggers were identified during isoproterenol infusion. All patients underwent extensive follow-up. Results Three groups differed in terms of left atrial (LA) size, non-PV triggers, and moderate/severe LA scar. Non-PV triggers were present in 94 (58.8%), 64 (33.3%), and 50 (27.9%) patients in groups I, II, and III, respectively (p < 0.001). After 19 ± 7.7 months of follow-up, 65 (40.6%), 54 (28.1%), and 46 (25.7%) patients in groups I, II, and III had recurrences (log-rank test, p = 0.003). Among patients in group I who underwent additional non-PV trigger ablation, freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia was 69.8%, which was similar to groups II and III procedural success (log-rank p = 0.7). After adjusting for confounders, uncontrolled hypertension (group I) (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.52, p = 0.045), non-PV triggers (HR: 1.85, p < 0.001), and nonparoxysmal AF (HR: 1.64, p = 0.002) demonstrated significant association with arrhythmia recurrence. Conclusions Controlled hypertension does not affect the AF ablation outcome when compared with patients without hypertension. By contrast, uncontrolled hypertension confers higher AF recurrence risk and requires more extensive ablation.
AB - Objectives The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of hypertension on the outcome of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Background Hypertension is a well-known independent risk factor for incident AF. Methods A total of 531 consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation were enrolled in this study and divided into 3 groups: patients with uncontrolled hypertension despite medical treatment (group I, n = 160), patients with controlled hypertension (group II, n = 192), and patients without hypertension (group III, n = 179). Pulmonary vein (PV) antrum and posterior wall isolation was always performed, and non-PV triggers were identified during isoproterenol infusion. All patients underwent extensive follow-up. Results Three groups differed in terms of left atrial (LA) size, non-PV triggers, and moderate/severe LA scar. Non-PV triggers were present in 94 (58.8%), 64 (33.3%), and 50 (27.9%) patients in groups I, II, and III, respectively (p < 0.001). After 19 ± 7.7 months of follow-up, 65 (40.6%), 54 (28.1%), and 46 (25.7%) patients in groups I, II, and III had recurrences (log-rank test, p = 0.003). Among patients in group I who underwent additional non-PV trigger ablation, freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia was 69.8%, which was similar to groups II and III procedural success (log-rank p = 0.7). After adjusting for confounders, uncontrolled hypertension (group I) (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.52, p = 0.045), non-PV triggers (HR: 1.85, p < 0.001), and nonparoxysmal AF (HR: 1.64, p = 0.002) demonstrated significant association with arrhythmia recurrence. Conclusions Controlled hypertension does not affect the AF ablation outcome when compared with patients without hypertension. By contrast, uncontrolled hypertension confers higher AF recurrence risk and requires more extensive ablation.
KW - atrial fibrillation
KW - catheter ablation
KW - hypertension
KW - non-PV triggers
KW - pulmonary vein isolation
KW - uncontrolled hypertension
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944047274&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944047274&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacep.2015.04.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jacep.2015.04.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84944047274
SN - 2405-500X
VL - 1
SP - 164
EP - 173
JO - JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
JF - JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
IS - 3
ER -