Abstract
Bolt and Mul argue persuasively against the "disease" approach and the "client" approach in addressing the question of whether growth hormone for short children properly belongs in the medical realm. Their own preferred approach, the "suffering" approach, is superior to the others but has practical problems that would arise in its application. An additional ethical issue, not addressed by Bolt and Mul, relates to justice in providing access for children from families of limited financial means to growth hormone treatment.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 5-6 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics |
Volume | 90 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 22 2001 |
Keywords
- Ethics
- Growth hormone
- Justice
- Short stature
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health